A PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDY OF DISCOURSE PRACTICES OF COLLEGE STUDENTS’ VIRTUAL COMMUNICATION

Keywords: virtual communication, college students, discourse practice, content analysis, intent analysis

Abstract

This article investigates the discourse practices of college students in virtual communication, emphasizing the impact on personal changes. The research aims to find out psychological features of college students’ discourse practices based on their virtual communication written products – email letters. The study employs Fairclough's (2010) three-dimensional model and the social constructionism approach to explore the relationship between discursive practices and social practices, drawing parallels with Vygotsky's (1978) sociocultural theory. The research analyzes 310 student emails, employing Critical Discourse Analysis, content analysis, and intent analysis to examine communication styles and motives. The findings reveal that virtual communication contributes to changes in the emotional and behavioural aspects of students, including increased anxiety, depression, social frustration, loneliness, aggressiveness, and motivation to avoid failure. The research identifies dominant communication styles such as dramatic, contradictory, attentive, and reliable, often observed concurrently in emails.

References

1. Засєкіна Л., Засєкін С. Вступ до психолінгвістики. Острог: острозька академія, 2002. 168 с.
2. Засєкіна Л., Засєкін С. Психолінгвістична діагностика. Луцьк : РВВ «Вежа» ВНУ ім. Лесі Українки, 2008. 188 с.
3. Засєкіна Л., Засєкін С., Шевчук О. Психолінгвістичний підхід до травматичної пам’яті. Beau Bassin: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. 244 с.
4. Посохова В. В. Особливості життєвих домагань адитивної молоді. Життєві домагання особистості / За ред. Т. М. Титаренко. Київ: Педагогічна думка, 2007. С. 319–351.
5. Почепцов Г. Г. Теорія комунікації. Київ: КНУ ім. Тараса Шевченка, 1999. 308 с.
6. Crystal, D. Language and Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 361 p.
7. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis. Second Edition. London: Longman.
8. Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical discourse analysis. In Handford, M., & Gee, J.P. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068
9. Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
10. Wodak, R. (2014). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge companion to English studies (pp. 302-316). Routledge.
Published
2024-01-09