THE CONCEPT OF NEUTRALITY AS AN INSTRUMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: HISTORICAL RETROSPECTION AND MODERNITY

Keywords: national security, neutrality, “Finlandization”, Swedish foreign policy, Finnish foreign policy, NATO, permanent neutrality

Abstract

The article is devoted to the comprehension of the phenomenon of "neutrality" of a country. A scientific analysis of the evolution of the content of neutrality in the international legal space is carried out. In international law, there is a concept of states with a "neutral" status. The significance of neutral policy especially increased during the Cold War, when neutral countries became a kind of "buffer" between the Western and Eastern military blocs. They played the role of a link between these blocs, made a significant contribution to the process of resolving differences between the warring parties, and were an integral part of the global political landscape. The Russian aggression has put the question of the change and emergence of a new international system on the agenda, and what will happen next? The world is changing, the world order is changing, the world order that we are used to, which emerged with the end of World War II and was transformed after the defeat of the USSR in the Cold War, no longer exists. There are profound changes in the matrix of the international security system, and these changes have affected states that considered themselves neutral, were neutral at one time or another, for one reason or another. The article analyzes the historical conditions for the formation of the neutral status of the Scandinavian countries – Finland and Sweden. It is noted that the conditions that led to the adoption of neutrality in politics are still different in the Swedish and Finnish cases. However, Russian aggression has caused dramatic changes in public opinion in Finland and Sweden regarding NATO membership. Such a radical transformation was the result of the reaction of the population of the Scandinavian countries to the symbolic crossing of the borders of the ontological security of the state, which destroyed the sense of security and raised the question of the relevance of the status of a neutral country in a period of danger to the European continent from the Russian Federation.

References

Cafiero, G. (2023). Finland’s long-held neutrality is over. What next? Aljazeera. April 6, 2023 [in English]. [Cafiero G. Finland’s long-held neutrality is over. What next? Aljazeera. April 6, 2023. URL: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/4/6/finlands-long-held-neutrality-is-over-what-next (дата звернення: 13.02.2024)].
Eliasson, J. (2004). Traditions, Identity and Security: The Legacy of Neutrality in Finnish and Swedish Security Policies in Light of European Integration. European Integration Online Papers, 8 [in English]. [Eliasson J. Traditions, Identity and Security: The Legacy of Neutrality in Finnish and Swedish Security Policies in Light of European Integration. European Integration Online Papers. 2004. p. 8. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5014999_Traditions_Identity_and_Security_The_Legacy_of_Neutrality_in_Finnish_and_Swedish_Security_Policies_in_Light_of_European_Integration (дата звернення: 13.02.2024)].
Klymchuk, Y. (2005). Hugo Grotius' contribution to the formation of the law of war. Law and Security, 4, 161–164 [in Ukrainian]. [Климчук Ю. Внесок Гуго Гроція у формування права війни. Право і Безпека. 2005. № 4. C. 161–164].
Rainio-Niemi, F. (2016). Finland’s Quest for Security in the Cold War. Journal of Cold War Studies. № 18.
P. 51–78 [in English]. [Rainio-Niemi F. Finland’s Quest for Security in the Cold War. Journal of Cold War Studies. 2016. № 18. P. 51–78. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/157586025.pdf. (дата звернення: 13.02.2024)].
Riste, O. (2001). Norway's Foreign Relations: A History. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget., 308 p. [in English]. [Riste O. Norway's Foreign Relations: A History. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2001. 308 p.].
Ojanen, H., Herolf, G., & Lindahl, R. (2000). Non–alignment and European Security Policy, Ambiguity at Work. Finnish Institute of International Affairs [in English]. [Ojanen H., Herolf G., Lindahl R. Non–alignment and European Security Policy, Ambiguity at Work. Finnish Institute of International Affairs. 2000. 273 p.].
On the State Sovereignty of Ukraine: Declaration of 16.07.1990 No. 55-XII. [in Ukrainian]. [Про державний суверенітет України: Декларація від 16.07.1990 № 55-XII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/55-12#Text (дата звернення: 13.02.2024)].
The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. Guide-Humanitarian-Law [in English]. [The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. Guide-Humanitarian-Law. URL: https://guide-humanitarian-law.org/content/article/3/the-hague-conventions-of-1899-and-1907/ (дата звернення: 13.02.2024)].
Tkachuk, I. (2013). International Legal Aspects of the Institute of Neutrality. International readings on international law in memory of Professor P. Kazansky: materials of the fourth international scientific conference. Odesa. [in Ukrainian]. [Ткачук І. Міжнародно-правові аспекти інституту нейтралітету. Міжнародні читання з міжнародного права пам’яті професора П. Є. Казанського : матеріали четвертої міжнар. наук. конф. Одеса. 2013. С. 560–563].
Published
2024-05-14
Section
INTERNATIONAL MEASURING OF TRANSFORMATION PROCESSES