PSYCHOANALYTICAL DIMENSION OF SOCIAL REALITY: BETWEEN THE PERSONAL AND COLLECTIVE UNCONSCIOUS
Abstract
The article provides a theoretical and methodological analysis of social reality through the lens of psychoanalytic thought, with a particular focus on the relationship between the personal and the collective unconscious. The relevance of the psychoanalytic approach is substantiated in the context of contemporary social transformations, including war, mass traumatic experiences, identity ruptures, social polarization, and intensified discourses of memory and collective guilt. It is argued that conventional sociological and political models are often insufficient for explaining the deep affective and symbolic dimensions of social processes, whereas psychoanalysis enables the exploration of latent psychic mechanisms that shape both individual and collective experience. The study engages with classical psychoanalytic concepts developed by S. Freud, C. G. Jung, and J. Lacan, which conceptualize culture as a space of repression, archetypal symbolization, and linguistic structuring of the unconscious. The article also analyzes contemporary Ukrainian psychoanalytically oriented studies that address the issues of war, memory, and collective trauma. It is demonstrated that the Ukrainian humanities increasingly integrate psychoanalytic methodology into an interdisciplinary framework combining psychology, philosophy, and cultural studies. Within this framework, social reality is interpreted as a symbolically structured field in which individual symptoms reflect broader social conflicts and unresolved historical tensions. The conclusion emphasizes that the psychoanalytic perspective contributes to a deeper understanding of mechanisms of social cohesion, collective protection, and the possibilities of symbolic working-through of traumatic experience in conditions of prolonged crisis and social transformation.
References
2. Болебер В. Пригадування, травма та колективна пам’ять у психоаналізі. Український психоаналітичний журнал. 2024. Т. 2, № 2. С. 118–135. DOI: 10.32782/upj/2024-2-2-11.
3. Забужко О. Філософія української історії в іменах. Київ : Комора, 2019. 272 с.
4. Лагутін В. Війна як простір для життя. Психоаналітичні рефлексії. Український психоаналітичний журнал. 2025. Т. 3, № 1. С. 26–35. DOI: 10.32782/upj/2025-3-1-4.
5. Лакан Ж. Експозиція. Вибрані праці. Київ : Основи, 2005. 368 с.
6. Тетенко Т. М. Колективна ідентичність: психолого-філософські аспекти. Київ : Логос, 2007. 224 с.
7. Табачковський В. Г. Пам’ять і ідентичність у посттоталітарному суспільстві. Київ : Дух і Літера, 2014. 312 с.
8. Фройд З. Невдоволення культурою. Про психоаналіз. Психоаналітичні етюди. Психологія мас та аналіз людського «Я». Харків : Фоліо, 2022. 544 с.
9. Abraham N., Torok M. The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1994. 287 p.
10. Hopper E. The Social Unconscious: Selected Papers. London : Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2003. 320 p.
11. Volkan V. D. Transgenerational transmissions and chosen traumas: An aspect of large-group identity. Group Analysis. 2001. 34(1). Р. 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/05333160122077730

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






