SYCHOLOGICAL BARRIERS TO PROFESSIONAL FEMALE LEADERSHIP: THE ROLE OF SHAME IN SUSTAINING GENDER INEQUALITY

Keywords: professional self-realization barrier, gender inequality, female leader, shame, social control, “glass ceiling”, “leaky pipe” effect, tokenism, “queen bee phenomenon”

Abstract

The article is devoted to the review of various theoretical approaches to the concept of shame, examining its origins and the developmental stages both in the ontogenetic growth of the individual and in the phylogenesis of humanity as a whole. Particular attention is paid to the manipulative potential of shame, which operates through unconscious submission to social rules and norms that were collectively internalized in the course of evolution but have lost their relevance in contemporary society. The article substantiates that shame, performing a function of social control, serves as an effective mechanism for restraining women both on the path to and within professional leadership.This is due to the fact that the very phenomenon of leadership is anachronistically associated by society with the male gender. The paper analyzes manifestations of such structural and interpersonal gender barriers as the “leaky pipeline” effect, the “glass ceiling,” tokenism, and the “queen bee” phenomenon. It reveals the shadow role of shame in each of these phenomena and illustrates their sequential interaction in the process of professional self-realization of a female leader. It is shown that shame functions not only as an external constraint in the form of social condemnation and public shaming of women for striving toward power – as a stereotypically masculine domain – but also as an internal behavioral regulator through the belief: “I don’t have the right to be here.” Thus, shame emerges as a multi-level sociopsychological construct that sustains models of patriarchal domination by suppressing women’s realization in the sphere of leadership.

References

1. Заграй Л. Д. Теорії гендеру: Гендерні дослідження у психології: навчальний посібник. ДВНЗ «Прикарпатський національний університет ім. В. Стефаника». Івано-Франківськ : ФОП Петраш К.Т. 2019. 264 с.
2. Карамушка Л.М., Ткалич М.Г. Гендерна взаємодія персоналу як психолого-організаційний феномен. Організаційна психологія. Економічна психологія. Науковий журнал. 2015. № 3. С. 44–51. URL: http://orgpsy-journal.in.ua/index.php/opep/article/view/221
3. Кормич Л. І. Соціально-рольовий вплив статей на суспільний розвиток. Актуальні проблеми політики. 2014. № 53. С. 11–19. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/appol_2015_53_4.
4. Рекуненко І. І., Гордієнко В. П., Балагуровська І. О., Дробот В. Д. Ефект скляної стелі у лідерстві. Менеджмент. 2025. № 1. https://orcid.org/10.5281/zenodo.14738123
5. Усанова Л., Нестеренко М. Гендерні стереотипи та проблеми лідерства. Соціальна філософія та філософія історії. Філософські обрії. 2015. № 33. С. 98–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.20383.
6. Alper J. The Pipeline Is Leaking Women All the Way Along. Science, Vol. 260, Issue 5106. 1993. P. 409–411. URL: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.260.5106.409
7. Arvate P. R., Galilea G. W., Todescat I. The queen bee: A myth? The effect of top-level female leadership on subordinate females. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 29, Issue 5. 2018. P. 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.002
8. Brown В. The Gifts of Imperfection. Penguin Random House UK. 2020. 240 p.
9. Brown В. Daring Greatly. Penguin. 2016. 304 p.
10. Brewis D., Soule R., Monteiro P., Kravcenko D. Talking about organizations. Tokenis-Rosabeth Moss Kanter. 2016. URL: https://www.talkingaboutorganizations.com/e17/
11. Derks B., Van Laar C., Ellemers N. The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 27. Issue 3. 2016. P. 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007
12. English F., Crespelle I. S’épanouir tout au long de sa vie. Paris: InterEditions-Dunod. 2010. 206 p.
13. English F. Shame and Social Control Revisited. Transactional Analysis Journal. 1994. № 24 (2). Р. 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215379402400206
14. Erikson E. H. Childhood and Society. New York. W. W. Norton & Company. 1993. 445 p.
15. Erskine R. G. Shame and Self-Righteousness: Transactional Analysis Perspectives and Clinical Interventions. Transactional Analysis Journal. 1994. № 24 (2). P. 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215379402400204
16. Erskine R. G., Clark B., Evans K. R., Goldberg C., Hyams H., James S. & O'Reilly- Knapp M. The Dynamics of Shame: A Roundtable Discussion. Transactional Analysis Journal. 1994. № 24 (2). P. 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215379402400203
17. Hanek, K. J., & Garcia, S. M. Barriers for women in the workplace: A social psychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2022. № 16 (10). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12706
18. Hyams H. Shame: The Enemy within. Transactional Analysis Journal. 1994. № 24 (4). P. 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215379402400404
19. International Labour Organization. Women in business and management: Building on the legacy of the Beijing Declaration. Research Brief. 2025. URL: https://www.ilo.org/publications/women-business-and-management-building-legacy-beijing-declaration
20. International Labour Organization. Women and the economy: 30 years after the Beijing Declaration. Research Brief. 2025. URL: https://www.ilo.org/publications/women-and-economy- 30-years-after-beijing-declaration
21. International Labour Organization. Women in business: How employer and business membership organizations drive gender equality. 2024. URL: https://www.ilo.org/publications/women-business-how-employer-and-business-membership-organizations-drive
22. Kagan J. The Glass Ceiling: Definition, History, Effects, and Examples. 2025 (1). URL: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/glass-ceiling.asp
23. Kanter R. M. Men and Women of the Corporation. Ingram Publisher Services. 1993. 416 p.
24. Nathanson D.L. Shame Transactions. Transactional Analysis Journal. 1994. № 24 (2). P. 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215379402400207
25. Schein V. A Global Look at Psychological Barriers to Women's Progress in Management. Journal of Social Issues. 2001. № 57 (4). P. 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00235
26. Staines G.L., Tavris C.A., Jayaratne T. E. The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today. 1974. № 7. P. 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/e400562009-003
27. Vargas T. She coined the term ‘glass ceiling.’ She fears it will outlive her. The Washington Post. 2018. № 03. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/03/01/she-coined-the-phrase-glass-ceiling-she-didnt-expect-it-to-outlive-her/
28. Zimmer L. Tokenism and Women in the Workplace: The Limits of Gender-Neutral Theory. Social Problems. 1988. № 35 (1). P. 64–77. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/800667
Published
2025-06-20