CONCEPT OF PATRON-CLIENTELISM AS AN ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE STUDY OF BILATERAL ASYMMETRIC RELATIONS BETWEEN COUNTRIES

Keywords: patron-clientelism, interstate patronage, asymmetric relations, commitment, security transfer

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the emergence and theoretical foundations of the patron-client concept as a new analytical tool for studying cooperation between states in the framework of asymmetric bilateral relations. The process and conditions of the rapid transfer of the patron-client model from anthropological research to a wide range of social sciences, including its adaptation to the needs of Western political science, are highlighted. In a broad sense, patron-client relationships are understood as a broad-based patronage by a powerful actor in exchange for the support and services of a weaker actor. At the same time, it is emphasized that the variability of these asymmetrical relationships is not so much rooted in the relations between the actors themselves, but in the socio-political context. The ideas and views of the American political scientists K. Carney, J. Spanier and K. Shoemaker, who laid the conceptual foundations for the application of the concept of patron-client relations to the study of international relations and world politics, are considered. It is emphasized that the driving force behind the formation of patron-client relations between two states is their significant asymmetry in military capabilities, which encourages the secondary state to see a potential patron as a provider of security. The article specifies four criteria proposed by C. Carney for determining interstate patronage relations – asymmetry, reciprocity, commitment, compliance, among which reciprocity and commitment are the elements that make these relations similar to friendly ones. The author of the article outlines three areas of international political studies where the concept of patron-clientelism is currently used: 1) great power patronage over medium and small states; 2) separatist conflicts; 3) state patronage over insurgent and political groups. The author also identifies promising aspects of theoretical research in this area.

References

Afoaku, O.G. (2000). U.S. foreign policy and authoritarian regimes: Change and continuity in international clientelism. Journal of Third World Studies, 17 (2), 13–40 [in English]. [Afoaku O.G. U.S. foreign policy and authoritarian regimes: Change and continuity in international clientelism. Journal of Third World Studies. 2000. Vol. 17. № 2. Р. 13–40.]
Bercovitch, J.E. (1991). Superpowers and client states in the Middle East: the imbalance of influence. London: Routledge [in English]. [Bercovitch J.E. Superpowers and client states in the Middle East: the imbalance of influence. London : Routledge, 1991. 288 p.]
Carney, C. (1989). International patron-client relationships: A conceptual framework. Studies in Comparative International Development. 1989, 24 (2), 42–55 [in English]. [Carney C. International patron-client relationships: A conceptual framework. Studies in Comparative International Development. 1989. Vol. 24. Issue 2. Р. 42–55.]
Ciorciari, J.D. (2015). A Chinese model for patron-client relations? The Sino-Cambodian partnership. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 15 (2), 245–278 [in English]. [Ciorciari J.D. A Chinese model for patron-client relations? The Sino-Cambodian partnership. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2015. Vol. 15. Issue 2. Р. 245–278.]
Dell’Aguzzo, L., & Diodato, E. (2022). Patron-client state relations and the geopolitics of authoritarian survival and breakdown: evidence from the MENA countries. Contemporary Politics, 1, 43–67 [in English]. [Dell’Aguzzo L., Diodato E. Patron-client state relations and the geopolitics of authoritarian survival and breakdown: evidence from the MENA countries. Contemporary Politics. 2022. Vol. 1. Р. 43–67.]
Eisenstadt, S.N., & Roniger, L. (1980). Patron-Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22 (1), 42–77 [in English]. [Eisenstadt S.N., Roniger L. Patron-Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 1980. Vol. 22. № 1. Р. 42–77.]
Kostetska, L.М. (2021). Patron-clientelism: a historical-theoretic approach. Scientific notes of V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Public administration, 32 (4), 8–16 [in Ukrainian]. [Костецька Л. Патрон-клієнтелізм: теоретико-історичний підхід. Вчені записки ТНУ імені В.І. Вернадського. Серія «Державне управління». 2021. Т. 32 (71). № 4. С. 8–16.]
Mamontova, E. & Kovaleva, O. (2020). Clientelism as a political and psychological phenomenon. Current policy issues, 66, 65–72 [in Ukrainian]. [Мамонтова Е., Ковальова О. Клієнтелізм як політико-психологічний феномен. Актуальні проблеми політики. 2020. Вип. 66. С. 65–72.]
Mаczak, A. (2017). Unequal Friendship. The Patron-Client Relationship in Historical Perspective. Warszawa: Peter Lang [in English]. [Mаczak A. Unequal Friendship. The Patron-Client Relationship in Historical Perspective. Monographs. Warszawa : Peter Lang, 2017. 446 p.]
Pelishenko, V. (2016). The problem field of clientelism in political discourse. European Political and Law Discourse, 3 (1), 99–105 [in Ukrainian]. [Пелішенко В. Проблемне поле клієнтелізму в політологічному дискурсі. European Political and Law Discourse. 2016. Vol. 3. Issue 1. Р. 99–105.]
Ruy, D., Conley, H., & Hillman, J. (2020). Becoming a Chinese client state: The case of Serbia, Center for Strategic and International Studies [in English]. [Ruy D., Conley H., Hillman J. Becoming a Chinese client state: The case of Serbia, Center for Strategic and International Studies. September 2020. URL: https://www.csis.org/analysis/becoming-chinese-client-state-case-serbia (дата звернення: 02.11.2024).]
Shoemaker, C. & Spanier, J. (1984). Patron-client state relationships: Multilateral crises in the nuclear age. New York: Praeger [in English]. [Shoemaker C., Spanier J. Patron-client state relationships: Multilateral crises in the nuclear age. New York : Praeger, 1984. 211 p.]
Sylvan, D. & Majeski, S. (2009). U.S. Foreign Policy in Perspective: Clients, enemies and empire. New York: Routledge [in English]. [Sylvan D., Majeski S. U.S. Foreign Policy in Perspective: Clients, enemies and empire. New York : Routledge, 2009. 336 p.]
Turenko, O.S. (2023). Inversion of tolerance: between political and legal theory and client tradition. Scientific notes. Series: Law, 15, 6–11 [in Ukrainian]. [Туренко О.С. Інверсія толерантності: між політико-правовою теорією та клієнтальною традицією. Наукові записки. Серія «Право». 2023. № 15. С. 6–11.]
Vinogradova, G. (2023). Relations of patrons and clients in ancient Rome in the context of private law. Grail of Science, 25, 115–120 [in Ukrainian]. [Виноградова Г. Відносини патронів і клієнтів в Стародавньому Римі в контексті приватного права. Grail of Science. 2023. № 25. С. 115–120.]
Published
2025-04-22
Section
THEORY AND HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT AND PROBLEMS OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE