MOTIVATIONAL PROFILE OF LABOR MIGRANTS DURING WAR
Abstract
This scientific study explores the motivations of economic (labor) migrants. It reveals that eco- nomic migrants exhibit a complex and sometimes contradictory structure in their motivational sphere. Most participants show a moderate level of motivation related to social recognition and the need for broad social contacts, indicating the importance of social approval and integration into the social environment.At the same time, most respondents do not demonstrate a strong orientation toward forming and maintaining long-term, stable relationships with a close circle of colleagues. This may suggest superficial social connections and a lack of deep integration into professional micro-groups.Material incentives remain a moderately significant motivational factor: the majority of partici- pants are focused on earning a high salary. The study also found a low tendency toward creativity and innovation, combined with a tolerance for routine and only a moderate need for engaging and meaningful work.A contradiction was identified: on one hand, respondents are willing to accept monotony and a lack of constant stimulation; on the other hand, they do not show a strong drive to seek mean- ing and personal significance in their professional activities. This may indicate a certain balance between adapting to standard working conditions and a limited focus on self-realization through work. The findings suggest that the motivational sphere of the participants is dominated by pragmatic and socially-oriented motives (financial security, recognition, social contacts), while motivation for creativity, professional self-realization, and deep interpersonal interaction is relatively weak. This points to an adaptive, but not innovation-driven, motivational model that supports stable function- ing but limits potential for personal growth and creative development.A two-factor model of the resource sphere in forced migrants was identified, consisting of an adaptation-external factor and an economic benefit factor.
References
2. Кіреєва З.О., Турлаков І.Д., Швайкін С.А., Балан М.А., Ріффа О.Г. Класифікація ресурсів й особливості ресурсної сфери у осіб різного віку під час війни. Наукові перспективи. 2025. № 6 (60). С. 1381–1392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2025-6(60).
3. Малімон Л.Я., Глова І.В. Мотивація професійної діяльності державних службовців місцевих органів виконавчої влади : монографія. Луцьк : ВежаДрук, 2015. 220 с.
4. McClelland D.C., Atkinson J.W., Clark R.A., & Lowell E.L. The achievement motive. Appleton– Century-Crofts, 1953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11144-000.
5. Portes A., Rumbaut R.G. Theoretical Overview: Theories of International Migration and Immigrant Adaptation. Chapter 2 of A. Portes and R.G. Rumbaut Immigrant America: A Portrait. 4th ed. University of California Press, 2014. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2780775.
6. Polavieja J.G., Fernández-Reino M., Ramos M. Are migrants selected on motivational orientations? Selectivity patterns amongst international migrants in Europe. Еuropean social science journal. 2018. Rev. 34. Р. 570–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy025.
7. Ryan R.M., & Deci E.L. Self-determination theory. Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. New York, NY : Guilford Press. 2017. Volume 38, Number 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1041847ar.
8. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation From a Self‐Determination Theory Perspective: Definitions, Theory, Practices, and Future Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2020. 61. Article 101860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
9. Van den Broeck A., Howard J.L., Van Vaerenbergh Y., Leroy H., & Gagné M. Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation. Organizational Psychology Review. 2021. 11(3). Р. 240–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866211006173.
