HETEROGENEITY OF APPROACHES TO DEFINING SEXUAL NORMS AND DEVIATIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL DISCOURSE
Abstract
The relevance of the study stems from the need for a deeper understanding of how people perceive and distinguish between paraphilic and normophilic sexual interests. This is especially important for the development of modern models of sexuality, improvement of psychological practice, high-quality forensic examination, and an effective system of mental and physical health care. The problem goes far beyond the dichotomy of “normpathology”, especially in the context of socio-psychological factors, individual experience, cultural influence, socialisation processes, ethical ideas and subjective perception.The purpose of the study is to theoretically examine the factors that influence attitudes towards sexual interests, including paraphilic ones. To achieve this goal, a number of tasks were set: to analyse the concepts of paraphilia and normophilia, to study perceptions of these interests and behaviour. The methodological apparatus of the study included a theoretical analysis of the literature.
References
2. Bhugra D., Popelyuk D., McMullen I. Paraphilias across cultures: Contexts and controversies. The Journal of Sex Research. 2010. Vol. 47, № 23. P. 242256. DOI 10.108000224491003699833
3. Downing L. Heteronormativity and Repronormativity in Sexological «Perversion Theory» and the DSM 5’s «Paraphilic Disorder» Diagnoses. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2015. Vol. 44. P. 11391145. DOI 10.1007s10508-015-0536-y
4. Fankhanel E., Esteban C., Berrios J., Figueroa F., Santos-Gómez M. Descriptive Paraphilic Behaviors in the General Non-Clinical Population in Puerto Rico. Revista Caribeña de Psicología. 2021. URL: https:www.researchgate.netpublication350875472_Descriptive_Paraphilic_Behaviors_in_the_General_Non-Clinical_Population_in_Puerto_Rico
5. Freud S. Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1991. 240 p. (Reprint of the original 1905 edition). URL: https:www.sas.upenn.edu~cavitchpdf-libraryFreud_SE_Three_Essays_complete.pdf
6. Joyal C. Controversies in the definition of paraphilia. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2018. Vol. 15. P. 13781380c. URL: https:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov30219664
7. Joyal C., Carpentier J. The Prevalence of Paraphilic Interests and Behaviors in the General Population: A Provincial Survey. Journal of Sex Research. 2017. Vol. 54. P. 161171c. URL: https:www.webofscience.comwoswosccfull-recordWOS:000393812800003
8. Joyal C.C., Cossette A., Lapierre V. What exactly is an unusual sexual fantasy? The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2015. Vol. 12, № 2. P. 328340. DOI 10.1111jsm.12734
9. Kim B., Benekos P.J., Merlo A.V. Sex offender recidivism revisited: review of recent meta- analyses on the effects of sex offender treatment. Trauma, Violence & Abuse. 2016. Vol. 17. P. 105117. URL: https:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov25575803
10. Moser C., Kleinplatz P.J. Conceptualization, history, and future of the paraphilias. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2020. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 379399. DOI 10.1146annurev-clinpsy050718-095548
11. Richters J., De Visser R.O., Rissel C.E., Grulich A.E., Smith A.M. Demographic and psychosocial features of participants in bondage and discipline, “sadomasochism” or dominance and submission (BDSM): Data from a national survey. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2008. Vol. 5, № 7. P. 16601668. DOI 10.1111j.1743-6109.2008.00795.x
12. Shyroka A., Zavada T. Psychological Patterns in Sexual Relationships: Ukrainian Adaptation of the Multidimensional Sexual Questionnaire. Journal of Education Culture and Society. 2022. № 2. Р. 431454. URL: https:www.researchgate.netpublication365361451
13. Spada A., Winters G., Jeglic E., Johnson B., Allan C. An exploration of racial and ethnic differences in paraphilic interests and behaviours among a nonoffending sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression. 2024. DOI 10.108013552600.2024.2332943
14. Wakefield J.S. DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: Tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 2011. Vol. 34. P. 195209. (Цит. за: Joyal C. Controversies in the definition of paraphilia. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2018. Vol. 15. P. 13781380. DOI 10.1111jsm.12734)
15. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11). Geneva: World Health Organization. 2018. Retrieved from: https:www.who.intclassificationsicden