THE TWO TYPES OF SOCIAL NORMS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF THEIR FORMATION

Keywords: social norm, moral social norm, conventional social norm, traditional social norm, prejudice.

Abstract

The paper considers principles of formation of the two types of social norms that can be denoted as moral and traditional social norms. Usually researchers distinguish the two types of social norms by source of their origin: moral and conventional social norms. The former are associated with a prohibition of causing harm to other people; the latter are associated with social agreements on standards of behavior in certain situations. I have suggested that those social norms that are not connected with the prohibition of causing harm to others, by their origin may be related not to convention between people, but to the fact that patterns of behavior that are common to individuals are considered to be obligatory for implementing standards. The possibility of creating social norms in this way was checked in an empirical study. The relationship between the tendency of an individual to apply traditional social norms and his individual characteristics was also considered. The results of the study confirmed the initial assumption. These results suggest that a role of social norms in the life of society is not only in creating the basis for corporate behavior, as researchers usually say. Social norms can also contribute to conservation of established behavioral patterns and formation of prejudices about non-standard behavior.

References

1. Бобнева, М. И. Социальные нормы и регуляция поведения: автореф. М.: Ин-т психологии АН СССР, 1980.
2. Товстокора Ю. В. Диверсифікація соціальних норм: репрезентація «іншого як інакшого» // Вісник Чернігівського національного педагогічного універ- ситету. Серія : Психологічні науки, 2015. С. 128, 249–252. http://nbuv.gov. ua/UJRN/VchdpuPH_2015_128_57.
3. Andrighetto G., Campenni M., Conte R., Paolucci M. On the Immergence of Norms: a Normative Agent Architecture, Proceedings of AAAI Symposium, Social and Organizational Aspects of Artificial Intelligence. Washington DC, 2007.
4. Cialdini R. B., Reno R. R., Kallgren C. A. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990. 58(6). P. 1015–1026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.58.6.1015
5. Crandall C. S., Ferguson M. A., Bahns A. J. When we see prejudice: The normative window and social change // C. Stangor & C. S. Crandall (Eds.) Frontiers of social psychology. Stereotyping and prejudice. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press, 2013. P. 53–69.
6. Detel W. On the concept of basic social norms. Analyse & Kritik. 2008. 30. P. 469–482.
7. Fehr E., Fischbacher U. Social Norms and Human Cooperation // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004. 8. P. 185–190.
8. Lisciandra C., Postma-Nilsenová, M., Colombo, M. Conformorality. A study on group conditioning of normative judgment // Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2013. 4. P. 751–764.
9. McDonald R., Crandall C. Social norms and social influence // Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2015. (3). P. 147–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cobeha.2015.04.006
10. Rakoczy H., Schmidt M. F. H. The early ontogeny of social norms // Child Development Perspectives. 2013. 7(1). P. 17–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ cdep.12010 11. Reynolds K. J., Subasic E., Tindall K. The problem of behaviour change: From social norms to an ingroup focus // Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2015. 9. P. 45–56. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12155.
12. Schmidt M. F. H., Tomasello M. Young children enforce social norms // Current Directions in Psychological Scienceю 2012. 21. P. 232–236. doi:10.1177/0963721412448659
Published
2023-08-17