PROBLEMS OF RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OF PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF PERSONALITY

Keywords: personality, professional well-being, conceptual research model

Abstract

The absence in the scientific literature of a generally accepted idea about the professional wellbeing of the individual caused the problem of the methodology of its research, which indicates the need for a theoretical understanding of the accumulated various data, their integration, as well as the need to find priority methodological ways of studying this phenomenon. The article contains an analysis of the specifics of psychological research on professional well-being, as well as a formulation based on the generalization of research practice of the main methodological approaches to the further development of a conceptual model for the study of the professional well-being of an individual. Given that a person is a holistic entity with a complex structure, the prospect of further scientific research will be the development of a conceptual model of the professional well-being of a person based on the implementation of the principles of a systemic approach, which will significantly expand the understanding of this phenomenon.

References

Войтенко О.В. Професійне благополуччя в системі саморегуляції особистості: теоретична модель. Психологічні студії. 2024. № 1. С. 18–23.

Волинець Н.В. Психологія особистісного благополуччя персоналу Державної прикордонної служби України : дис. … докт. псих. наук : 19.00.01. Київ, 2020. 543 с.

Armstrong M., Taylor S. Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. London : Kogan Page, 2020. 800 р.

Blanco F. Cognitive Bias. Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior / Editors: J. Vonk, T.K. Shackelford. Publisher : Springer, 2017. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication.

Diener E., Ryan K. Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology. 2011. № 39 (4). P. 391–406.

Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being / E. Diener et al. Collabra : Psychology, 2018. V. 4 (1). P. 15.

Fisher C.D. Happiness at Work. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2010. V. 12 (4). P. 384–412.

Happiness at work: A cross-cultural validation of happiness at work scale / N. Fitriana et al. PloS one. 2022. V. 17 (1). e0261617.

Ford M.T., Jin J. Incongruence between workload and occupational norms for time pressure predicts depressive symptoms. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2015. V. 24. P. 88–100.

Employee Well-Being Evaluation and Proposal of Activities to Increase the Level of Health’s Area – The Czech Case / P. Horváthová et al. Administrative Sciences. 2021. V. 11 (1). P. 17.

Joshanloo M., Weijers D. A two-dimensional conceptual framework for understanding mental well-being. PLoS ONE. 2019. V. 14 (3). e0214045.
Published
2024-08-17