MEDIATION AS A TOOL OF QATAR’S DIPLOMATIC SERVICE: AN EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION IN ITS MODERN FOREIGN POLICY

Keywords: mediation tools, diplomatic service of Qatar, global and regional conflicts, the peaceful settlement of disputes, geopolitical challenges, international authority, peacekeeping processes, diplomatic initiatives

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to assess the effectiveness of the mediation tools of Qatar’s diplomatic service while implementing its foreign policy. The relevance of the topic is due to the insufficient disclosure of this topic in scientific circles and academic literature.Despite the fact that the role of Qatar in the international arena and the activities of its diplomatic service have repeatedly become the subject of general analysis, the concept of active mediation by this state in global and regional conflicts has not yet been fully explored. In the current conditions of global instability, conflicts, and numerous challenges in international relations, there is a growing need for mediation missions that can contribute to the peaceful settlement of disputes, the development of diplomatic and trade relations, and ensuring stability in strategically important regions. Qatar, one of the most economically developed countries in the Middle East, acts as an important mediator in international affairs, which is of particular relevance for Ukraine in the context of ongoing geopolitical challenges. Despite its small territory and limited military resources, Qatar is actively developing diplomatic relations and strengthening its international authority through the role of a peaceful mediator, ready to help resolve conflicts in various regions. The research on the topic “Mediation as a tool of Qatar’s diplomatic service: effective implementation in its modern foreign policy” covers the period from the end of the 20th century to the present day, with a focus on the development of Qatar’s foreign policy strategy, its role in international conflicts, and diplomatic initiatives. The work itself implemented several basic research methods, including event analysis, case studies, historical, and functional methods.

References

Al-Kubaisi, H. (2023). The 2022 World Cup and Shifts in Qatar’s Foreign Policy. Journal of Arabian Studies, 13(1), 30–50. [in English]. [Al-Kubaisi H. The 2022 World Cup and Shifts in Qatar’s Foreign Policy. Journal of Arabian Studies. 2023. Vol. 13, Is. 1. С. 30–50. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2024.2354965 (дата звернення: 23.07.2025).]
Ayotte, K., Dunford J., Lindborg, N. (2021, February). Afghanistan Study Group Final Report. United States Institute of Peace, 1-84. [in English]. [Ayotte K., Dunford J., Lindborg N. Afghanistan Study Group Final Report. United States Institute of Peace. 2021. February. P. 1-84. URL: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/202102/afghanistan_study_group_final_report_a_pathway_for_peace_in_afghanistan.pdf (дата звернення: 23.07.2025).]
Barakat, S. (2024, August). Niche small States in Humanitarian Diplomacy: Qatar’s Positionality in the Protection Ecosystem. International Review of the Red Cross. IRRC, 926 [in English]. [Barakat S. Niche small States in Humanitarian Diplomacy: Qatar’s Positionality in the Protection Ecosystem. International Review of the Red Cross. IRRC No. 926 August 2024. URL: https://international-review.icrc.org/articles/niche-small-states-in-humanitarian-diplomacy-qatars-positionality-926 (дата звернення: 25.07.2025).]
Barakat, S. (2014). Qatari Mediation: Between Ambition and Achievement. Brookings Doha Center Analysis Paper/ Foreign Policy at Brookings, 12, 1-53. [in English]. [Barakat S. Qatari Mediation: Between Ambition and Achievement. Brookings Doha Center Analysis Paper/Foreign Policy at Brookings. 2014. Vol. 12. P. 1–53. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/final-pdf-english.pdf (дата звернення: 24.07.2025).]
Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R. (2019). Arab Geopolitics in Turmoil: Implications of Qatar-Gulf Crisis for Business. The Economic Research Forum. Working Paper No. 1337, 1-42. [in English]. [Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R. Arab Geopolitics in Turmoil: Implications of Qatar-Gulf Crisis for Business. The Economic Research Forum. Working Paper No. 1337. August 2019. P. 1–42. URL: https://erf.org.eg/publications/arab-geopolitics-in-turmoil-implications-of-qatar-gulf-crisis-for-business (дата звернення: 24.07.2025).]
Danylov, S. (2024). Ukraine-Qatar: Opportunities beyond Mediation. Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism”, 1-24. [In Ukrainian]. [Данилов С. Україна-Катар: можливості поза межами медіації. Рада зовнішньої політики «Українська призма». 2024. С. 1–24. URL: https://prismua.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/En_QATAR_.pdf (дата звернення: 27.07.2025).]
Fadnes, J. (2019). Mediation in international conflicts: the impartial, empowering and pressing mediator. The University of Queensland / School of Political Science & International Studies, Australia, 1-252. [in English]. [Fadnes J. Mediation in international conflicts: the impartial, empowering and pressing mediator. The University of Queensland / School of Political Science & International Studies, Australia. 2019. P. 1–252. URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:5bb94de (дата звернення: 21.07.2025).]
Goetschel, L. (2021). Neutral States as Peace Mediators: Favoured or Restrained by Norms? Laurent University of Basel. Swiss Political Science Review, 26(4), 527–534. [in English]. [Goetschel L. Neutral States as Peace Mediators: Favoured or Restrained by Norms? Laurent University of Basel. Swiss Political Science Review. 2021. Vol. 26, Is. 4. P. 527–534. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/spsr.12427 (дата звернення: 21.07.2025).]
Guterres, A. (2017). United Nations Activities in Support of Mediation. Report of Sectretary-General. A/72/115, 1-28. [in English]. [Guterres A. United Nations Activities in Support of Mediation. Report of Sectretary- General. A/72/115, 2017. 27 June. P. 1–28. URL: https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/default/files/document/files/2022/08/dpa-report-rev9-eng-web.pdf (дата звернення: 21.07.2025).]
Kamrava, M. (2011). Mediation and Qatari Foreign Policy. Georgetown University Qatar. The Middle East Journal, 65(4), 539-556. [in English]. [Kamrava M. Mediation and Qatari Foreign policy. Georgetown University Qatar. The Middle East Journal. 2011. Vol. 65, Is. 4. P. 539–556.]
Lysak, V. (2015). Peacemaking in modern international relations. Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk University. Series: philosophy, sociology, political science, 2, 24–33. [In Ukrainian]. [Лисак В. Миротворчість в сучасних міжнародних відносинах. Вісник Дніпропетровського університету. Серія: філософія, соціологія, політологія. 2015. № 2. С. 24–33. URL: https://visnukpfs.dp.ua/index.php/PFS/article/view/678/718 (дата звернення: 21.07.2025).]
Mohamed, A. (2025). Qatari Peace Mediation and Humanitarian Aid in Sudan: Lessons from the War in Darfur 2003–2022. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 20(2), 86-99. [in English]. [Mohamed A. Qatari Peace Mediation and Humanitarian Aid in Sudan: Lessons from the War in Darfur 2003–2022. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development. February 2025. Vol. 20. Is. 2. P. 86–99. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388937382_Qatari_Peace_Mediation_and_Humanitarian_Aid_in_Sudan_Lessons_From_the_War_in_Darfur_2003-2022 (дата звернення: 25.07.2025).]
Nissioti, E (2022). It Takes Three to Tango: A Behavioral Analysis of the Benefits of Having a Mediator in International Disputes. German Law Journal, 23, 376–394. [in English]. [Nissioti E. It Takes Three to Tango: A Behavioral Analysis of the Benefits of Having a Mediator in International Disputes. German Law Journal 2022. Vol. 23. P. 376–394. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.21 (дата звернення: 23.07.2025).]
Oberman, S. (2005). Mediation Theory vs. Practice: What are we Really Doing? Re-Solving a Professional Conundrum. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 20(3), 755-824. [in English]. [Oberman S. Mediation Theory vs. Practice: What are we Really Doing? Re-Solving a Professional Conundrum. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution. 2005. Vol. 20, Is. 3. P. 755–824. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/159562847.pdf (дата звернення: 23.07.2025).]
Weber, M. (2025). Democracy and Human Rights in U.S. Foreign Policy: Evolution, Tools, and Considerations for Congress. Congressional Research Service Report, prepared for Members and Committees of Congress. January 7, 1-40. [in English]. [Weber M. Democracy and Human Rights in U.S. Foreign Policy: Evolution, Tools, and Considerations for Congress. Congressional Research Service Report, prepared for Members and Committees of Congress. 2025. January 7. P. 1–40. URL: https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/default/files/document/files/2022/08/dpa-report-rev9-eng-web.pdf (дата звернення: 21.07.2025).]
Yemets, V. (2024). The Role of Media Diplomacy in Shaping the State’s International Image. Language Culture Politics International Journal, November, 133–145. [in English]. [Yemets V. The Role of Media Diplomacy in Shaping the State’s International Image. Language Culture Politics International Journal. November 2024. P. 133–145. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385877780_The_Role_of_Media_Diplomacy_in_Shaping_the_State’s_International_Image (дата звернення: 27.07.2025).]
Published
2025-11-10
How to Cite
Poble, D. K., & Morozova, A. R. (2025). MEDIATION AS A TOOL OF QATAR’S DIPLOMATIC SERVICE: AN EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION IN ITS MODERN FOREIGN POLICY. International and Political Studies, (40), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.32782/2707-5206.2025.40.19
Section
INTERNATIONAL MEASURING OF TRANSFORMATION PROCESSES