TERRITORIAL POLICY IN MULTICOMPONENT SYSTEMS AS AN OBJECT OF THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Keywords:
territorial policy, methodology, political processes, deconstruction of the world order, constructivism, spatial development, decentralization
Abstract
The article "Territorial Policy in Multicomponent Systems as an Object of Theoretical and Methodological Analysis" is devoted to the analysis of the evolution of methodological approaches to the scientific study of territorial policy. The article indicates the stages of methodological development of the analysis of territorial-political systems (TPS), which was accompanied by the transformation of the dominant object of research from: 1) "large" hierarchical "living spaces" of nation-states; to 2) "meso-level" of TPS and to 3) "multimodal spatial units", which operate according to the postmodern logic of political actors and have been studied since the 60s of the twentieth century on the basis of structuralism and constructivism. It is noted that the political processes of the last seven decades demonstrate the deconstruction of the world order, accompanied by the restructuring of national political systems due to increased glocalisation. The article examines the breakdown of "methodological nationalism" and the replacement of the top-down logic of analysis with the bottom-up one, when the decentralisation of the national in the global shifted the attention of researchers and became an instrument of spatial and territorial deconstruction. The article notes that the political process being constructed in the global dimension demonstrates the transformation of territorial and political space from a condition of the political process to the result of political construction, where territorial policy is a set of measures to ensure territorial development and stabilisation of political systems. In the first part of the article, "Territorial Possession" VS. "Spatial Development", the author examines the methodological turn associated with the institutionalisation of European integration into the EU against the backdrop of the transformation of political relations in postcolonial systems. It is noted that the EU has become a model for implementing the strategy of spatial development of complex political systems in the context of deterritorialisation of the political process, where the concept of "territorial possessions" has been transformed into "spatial development", and the region has become a modular unit of dehierarchisation and decentralisation of the TPS. The second part of the article examines the theoretical areas integrated into the complex of "territorial policy" research: Federal Studies, Local Government Studies, Multilevel Government Studies, Polycentric Governance, Electoral Geography and Urban Studies.
References
Agranoff, R. (2004). Autonomy, Devolution and Intergovernmental Relations. Regional & Federal Studies, 14(1), 26 – 65 [in English]. [Agranoff R. Autonomy, Devolution and Intergovernmental Relations. Regional & Federal Studies. 2004. Vol. 14. Is. 1. P. 26 – 65].
Almond, G. (1956). Comparative Political Systems. The Journal of Politics, 18(3), 391–409 [in English]. [Almond G. Comparative Political Systems. The Journal of Politics. 1956. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 391 – 409].
Anthony, K. (2006). The Political Representation of Ethnic and Racial Minorities. Briefing Paper 3/06. NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service [in English]. [Anthony K. The Political Representation of Ethnic and Racial Minorities. Briefing Paper 3/06. NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service. 2006. 95 p.]
Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-Level Governance and the Study of the British State. Public Policy and Administration, 19(1), 31 – 51 [in English]. [Bache I., Flinders M. Multi-Level Governance and the Study of the British State. Public Policy and Administration. 2004. Vol. 19. Is. 1. P. 31 – 51].
Bennett, R.J. (1993). European Local Government Systems. Local Government in the New Europe. London – NY: Belhaven Press [in English]. [Bennett R. J. European Local Government Systems. Local Government in the New Europe. London – NY: Belhaven Press. 1993. P. 28 – 47].
Bloemraad, I. (2013). Accessing the Corridors of Power: Puzzles and Pathways to Understanding Minority Representation. West European Politics, 36(3), 652 – 670 [in English]. [Bloemraad I. Accessing the Corridors of Power: Puzzles and Pathways to Understanding Minority Representation. West European Politics. 2013. Vol. 36. No. 3. P. 652 – 670].
Bogdanor, V. (1979). Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: OUP [in English]. [Bogdanor V. Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: OUP, 1979. 342 p.]
Brenner, N. (1998). Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 5(1), 1 – 37 [in English]. [Brenner N. Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy. 1998. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 1 – 37].
Bulpitt, J. (1983). Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: an Interpretation. Manchester: Manchester University Press [in English]. [Bulpitt J. Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: an Interpretation. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1983. 250 p.]
Burgess, M. (2006). Territoriality and Federalism in the Governance of the European Union. State Territoriality and European Integration / M. Burgess and H. Vollaard (eds.). London: Routledge, 100 – 119 [in English]. [Burgess M. Territoriality and Federalism in the Governance of the European Union. State Territoriality and European Integration / M. Burgess and H. Vollaard (eds.). London: Routledge, 2006. P. 100 – 119].
Burrows, B., & Denton G. (1980). Devolution or Federalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan [in English]. [Burrows B., Denton G. Devolution or Federalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1980. 94 p.].
Carmichael, P., Massey, A., McMillan, J., & Rhodes, R.A.W. (2003). Decentralizing the Civil Service from Unitary State to Differentiated Polity in the United Kingdom. Buckinghem: Open University Press [in English]. [Carmichael P., Massey A., McMillan J., Rhodes R.A.W. Decentralizing the Civil Service from Unitary State to Differentiated Polity in the United Kingdom. Buckinghem: Open University Press, 2003. 208 р.].
Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy,13(1), 5 – 21 [in English]. [Carothers T. The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy. 2002. Vol. 13. No 1. P. 5 – 21].
Dardanelli, P. (2009). Europeanization as Heresthetics: Party Competition over Self-Government for Scotland, 1974–97. Party Politics, 15(1), 49 – 68 [in English]. [Dardanelli P. Europeanization as Heresthetics: Party Competition over Self-Government for Scotland, 1974–97. Party Politics. 2009. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 49 – 68].
De Witte, B., Ott, A., & Vos, E. (2017). Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory of Differentiation in EU Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing [in English]. [De Witte B., Ott A., Vos E. Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory of Differentiation in EU Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. 448 p.]
Deschouwer, K. (2003). Political Parties in Multi-Layered Systems. European Urban and Regional Studies,10, 213 – 226 [in English]. [Deschouwer K. Political Parties in Multi-Layered Systems. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2003. No. 10. P. 213 – 226].
Duchacek, I.D. (1987). Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. Lanham. MD: University Press of America [in English]. [Duchacek I. D. Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. Lanham. MD: University Press of America, 1987. 370 p.]
Duchacek, I.D. (1990). Perforated Souvereignties: Towards a Typology of New Actors in International Relations / Federalism and International Relations / The Role of Subnational Units. Ed. By H. J. Michelman and P. Soldatos. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1–33 [in English]. [Duchacek I. D. Perforated Souvereignties: Towards a Typology of New Actors in International Relations / Federalism and International Relations / The Role of Subnational Units. Ed. By H. J. Michelman and P. Soldatos. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1990. P. 1–33].
Easton, D. (1953). The Political System, an Inquiry into the State of Political Science. NY: Alfred A. Knopf Inc [in English]. [Easton D. The Political System, an Inquiry into the State of Political Science. NY: Alfred A. Knopf Inc. 1953. 320 p.]
Elazar, D.J. (1966). American Federalism: A View from the States. NY: Crowell [in English]. [Elazar D. J. American Federalism: A View from the States. NY: Crowell, 1966. 228 p.]
Elazar, D.J. (1993). International and Comparative Federalism. PS: Political Science & Politics, 26(2). 190 – 195 [in English]. [Elazar D. J. International and Comparative Federalism. PS: Political Science & Politics. 1993. Vol. 26. Is. 2. P. 190–195].
Forest, B. (2018). Electoral Geography: From Mapping Votes to Representing Power. Geography Compass,12(1) [in English]. [Forest B. Electoral Geography: From Mapping Votes to Representing Power. Geography Compass. 2018. Vol. 12, Is. 1].
George, St. (2004). Multi-Level Governance and the European Union, 107 – 126 [in English]. [George St. Multi-Level Governance and the European Union. Multi-level Governance / I. Bache, M. Flinders (eds.). Oxford: OUP. 2004. P. 107–126].
Hechter, M., Mueller, S. & Siroky D. S. (2016). Center-Periphery Bargaining in the Age of Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review, 22(40), 439 – 453 [in English]. [Hechter M., Mueller S., Siroky D. S. Center-Periphery Bargaining in the Age of Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review. 2016. Vol. 22. Is .4. P. 439 – 453].
Heinelt, H. & Hlepas, Т. (2006). Typologies of Local Government Systems. The European Mayor Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy , 21 – 42 [in English]. [Heinelt H., Hlepas Т. – К. Typologies of Local Government Systems. The European Mayor Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy / H. Bäck, H. Heinelt, A. Magnier (eds.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. 2006. P. 21 – 42].
Hobson, J. (2011). What’s at Stake in ‘Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations’? Transcending ‘Chronofetishism’ and ‘Tempo Centrism’ in International Relations [in English]. [Hobson J. What’s at Stake in ‘Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations’? Transcending ‘Chronofetishism’ and ‘Tempo Centrism’ in International Relations. Historical Sociology of Internatioal Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 3–41].
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001. 251 p.]
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review,2, 233 – 243 [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review. 2003. No. 2. P. 233 – 243].
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2020). A Postfunctional Theory of European Integration [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. A Postfunctional Theory of European Integration. URL: http://www.unc.edu/depts/europe/conferences/euroskepticism/papers/hooghe_marks.doc (дата звернення 15.02.2023)].
Jeffery, Ch., & Wincott, D. (2010). The Challenge of Territorial Politics: Beyond Methodological Nationalism. New directions in political science: Responding to the challenges of an interdependend world, 167 – 188 [in English]. [Jeffery Ch., Wincott D. The Challenge of Territorial Politics: Beyond Methodological Nationalism. New directions in political science: Responding to the challenges of an interdependend world / C. Hay (ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2010. Р. 167 – 188].
Kaplan, M.A. (2005). System and Process in International Politics. UK: ECPR Press, University of Essex in Colchester [in English]. [Kaplan M. A. System and Process in International Politics. UK: ECPR Press, University of Essex in Colchester, 2005. 253 p.]
Keating, M. (2001). Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford [in English]. [Keating M. Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford: OUP, 2001. 212 p.]
Keating, M. (2008). Thirty Years of Territorial Politics. West European Politics, 31(1), 60 – 81 [in English]. [Keating M. (2008) Thirty Years of Territorial Politics. West European Politics. 2008. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 60 – 81].
Larkins, J. (2009). From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics before Westphalia. NY: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Larkins J. From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics before Westphalia. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 269 p.].
Lefebvre, H. (2009). State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press [in English]. [Lefebvre H. State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009. 330 p.].
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers [in English]. [Lefebvre H. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1991. 454 p.].
Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R.Y., & Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press [in English]. [Leonardi R., Nanetti R. Y., Putnam R. D. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993. 280 p.].
Levine, S. (2021, 22 Aug). ‘From dark art to dark science’: the evolution of digital gerrymandering. The Guardian [in English]. [Levine S. (2) ‘From dark art to dark science’: the evolution of digital gerrymandering. The Guardian. 22 Aug 2021. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/22/gerrymandering-uselectoral-districts-congress].
Linz, J., Stepan, A., & Yadav, Y. (2011). Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press [in English]. [Linz J., Stepan A., Yadav Y. Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2011. 336 p.]
Lipset, S.M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. NY: Free Press, 1 – 64 [in English]. [Lipset S. M., Rokkan S. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives / S. M. Lipset, and S. Rokkan (eds.). NY: Free Press, 1967. P. 1 – 64].
Lluch, J. (2011). Autonomism and Federalism. The Journal of Federalism [in English]. [Lluch J. Autonomism and Federalism. The Journal of Federalism. 27.05.2011. P. 1 – 28].
Loughlin, J. (2007). Subnational Government: The French Experience. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and NY: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Loughlin J. Subnational Government: The French Experience. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 239 p.]
Mueller, S. (2012). Federalism and the Concept of Political Territoriality Towards an Analytical Framework for Comparative Territorial Politics. Dans L'Europe en Formation, 1(363), 95 – 120 [in English]. [Mueller S. Federalism and the Concept of Political Territoriality Towards an Analytical Framework for Comparative Territorial Politics. Dans L'Europe en Formation. 2012. Vol. 1 No. 363. P. 95 – 120].
Muller, H., & Matthijs, В. (2001). Unravelling Territoriality in the European Union: Reconfiguring Territorial Affairs by Reconsidering the Guardian and Commercial Systems of Survival. Open Journal of Social Science, 9(5) [in English]. [Muller H., Matthijs В. Unravelling Territoriality in the European Union: Reconfiguring Territorial Affairs by Reconsidering the Guardian and Commercial Systems of Survival. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2001. Vol. 9. No. 5].
Nijman, J.E. (2016). The Renaissance of the City as a Global Actor – The Role of Foreign Policy and International Law Practices in the Construction of Cities as Global Actors’. The Transformation of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries from Antiquity to the Present. Oxford University Press, 209–241 [in English]. [Nijman J. The Renaissance of the City as a Global Actor – The Role of Foreign Policy and International Law Practices in the Construction of Cities as Global Actors’. The Transformation of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries from Antiquity to the Present /Eds. by Andreas Fahrmeier et al. Oxford University Press, 2016. Р. 209–241].
Page, E.C. (1992). Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-Government. Oxford: OUP [in English]. [Page E. C. Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-Government. Oxford: OUP, 1992. 200 p.].
Penrose, J. (2002). Nations, States and Homelands: Territory and Territoriality in Nationalist Thought. Nations and Nationalism, 8(3), 280 – 281 [in English]. [Penrose J. Nations, States and Homelands: Territory and Territoriality in Nationalist Thought. Nations and Nationalism. 2002. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 280 – 281].
Raffestin, C. (1984). Territoriality – A Reflection of the Discrepancies Between the Organization of Space and Individual Liberty. International Political Science Review, 5(2), 139 – 146 [in English]. [Raffestin C. Territoriality– A Reflection of the Discrepancies Between the Organization of Space and Individual Liberty. International Political Science Review. 1984. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 139 – 146].
Riker, W. (1964) Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company [in English]. [Riker W. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1964. 169 p.].
Rommele, A. (1999). Cleavage Structure and Party Systems in East and Central Europe. Cleavages, parties and voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania [in English]. [Rommele A. Cleavage Structure and Party Systems in East and Central Europe. Cleavages, parties and voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania / Lawson K., et. al. (eds.). Westport: Praeger, 1999. P. 3 – 17].
Rosenau, J.N. (1997). Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. NY: CUP [in English]. [Rosenau J. N. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. NY: CUP, 1997. 467 p.].
Schmitter, P.C. (1996). Examining the Present Euro-Polity with the Help of Past Theories. Governance in the European Union / G. Marks, F. Scharpf, P. Schmitter (eds.) London: Sage, 1–14 [in English]. [Schmitter P. C. Examining the Present Euro-Polity with the Help of Past Theories. Governance in the European Union / G. Marks, F. Scharpf, P. Schmitter, W. L. Streeck. (eds.) London: Sage Publications. 1996. P. 1 – 14].
Smith, B.C. (1985). Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: G. Allen & Unwin [in English]. [Smith B. C. Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1985. 227 р.].
Soja, E.W. (1971). The Political Organization of Space. Washington, D.C.: Resource paper No. 8., Association of American Geographers. Commission on College Geography [in English]. [Soja E. W. The Political Organization of Space. Washington, D.C.: Resource paper No. 8., Association of American Geographers. Commission on College Geography. 1971. 54 p.].
Vimmr, M. (2015). Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities at Local Level: Factors, Context and Empirical Examples. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences,15(4), 352 – 373 [in English]. [Vimmr M. Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities at Local Level: Factors, Context and Empirical Examples. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. 2015. Vol. 15. Is. 4. P. 352 – 373].
Walsh, D. (2018). Territorial Self-Government as a Conflict Management Tool. London: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Walsh D. Territorial Self-Government as a Conflict Management Tool. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 245 p.].
Watson, A. (1992). The Evolution of International Society. London and New York: Routledge [in English]. [Watson A. The Evolution of International Society. London and New York: Routledge, 1992. 346 p.].
Uzun, Y.V. (2021). Appropriation of space: organisation of interaction in complex political systems. Odesa: Phoenix [in Ukrainian]. [Узун Ю. В. Привласнення простору: організація взаємодії в складних політичних системах. Одеса: фенікс, 2021. 378 с.].
Almond, G. (1956). Comparative Political Systems. The Journal of Politics, 18(3), 391–409 [in English]. [Almond G. Comparative Political Systems. The Journal of Politics. 1956. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 391 – 409].
Anthony, K. (2006). The Political Representation of Ethnic and Racial Minorities. Briefing Paper 3/06. NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service [in English]. [Anthony K. The Political Representation of Ethnic and Racial Minorities. Briefing Paper 3/06. NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service. 2006. 95 p.]
Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-Level Governance and the Study of the British State. Public Policy and Administration, 19(1), 31 – 51 [in English]. [Bache I., Flinders M. Multi-Level Governance and the Study of the British State. Public Policy and Administration. 2004. Vol. 19. Is. 1. P. 31 – 51].
Bennett, R.J. (1993). European Local Government Systems. Local Government in the New Europe. London – NY: Belhaven Press [in English]. [Bennett R. J. European Local Government Systems. Local Government in the New Europe. London – NY: Belhaven Press. 1993. P. 28 – 47].
Bloemraad, I. (2013). Accessing the Corridors of Power: Puzzles and Pathways to Understanding Minority Representation. West European Politics, 36(3), 652 – 670 [in English]. [Bloemraad I. Accessing the Corridors of Power: Puzzles and Pathways to Understanding Minority Representation. West European Politics. 2013. Vol. 36. No. 3. P. 652 – 670].
Bogdanor, V. (1979). Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: OUP [in English]. [Bogdanor V. Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: OUP, 1979. 342 p.]
Brenner, N. (1998). Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 5(1), 1 – 37 [in English]. [Brenner N. Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy. 1998. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 1 – 37].
Bulpitt, J. (1983). Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: an Interpretation. Manchester: Manchester University Press [in English]. [Bulpitt J. Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: an Interpretation. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1983. 250 p.]
Burgess, M. (2006). Territoriality and Federalism in the Governance of the European Union. State Territoriality and European Integration / M. Burgess and H. Vollaard (eds.). London: Routledge, 100 – 119 [in English]. [Burgess M. Territoriality and Federalism in the Governance of the European Union. State Territoriality and European Integration / M. Burgess and H. Vollaard (eds.). London: Routledge, 2006. P. 100 – 119].
Burrows, B., & Denton G. (1980). Devolution or Federalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan [in English]. [Burrows B., Denton G. Devolution or Federalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1980. 94 p.].
Carmichael, P., Massey, A., McMillan, J., & Rhodes, R.A.W. (2003). Decentralizing the Civil Service from Unitary State to Differentiated Polity in the United Kingdom. Buckinghem: Open University Press [in English]. [Carmichael P., Massey A., McMillan J., Rhodes R.A.W. Decentralizing the Civil Service from Unitary State to Differentiated Polity in the United Kingdom. Buckinghem: Open University Press, 2003. 208 р.].
Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy,13(1), 5 – 21 [in English]. [Carothers T. The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy. 2002. Vol. 13. No 1. P. 5 – 21].
Dardanelli, P. (2009). Europeanization as Heresthetics: Party Competition over Self-Government for Scotland, 1974–97. Party Politics, 15(1), 49 – 68 [in English]. [Dardanelli P. Europeanization as Heresthetics: Party Competition over Self-Government for Scotland, 1974–97. Party Politics. 2009. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 49 – 68].
De Witte, B., Ott, A., & Vos, E. (2017). Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory of Differentiation in EU Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing [in English]. [De Witte B., Ott A., Vos E. Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory of Differentiation in EU Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. 448 p.]
Deschouwer, K. (2003). Political Parties in Multi-Layered Systems. European Urban and Regional Studies,10, 213 – 226 [in English]. [Deschouwer K. Political Parties in Multi-Layered Systems. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2003. No. 10. P. 213 – 226].
Duchacek, I.D. (1987). Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. Lanham. MD: University Press of America [in English]. [Duchacek I. D. Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. Lanham. MD: University Press of America, 1987. 370 p.]
Duchacek, I.D. (1990). Perforated Souvereignties: Towards a Typology of New Actors in International Relations / Federalism and International Relations / The Role of Subnational Units. Ed. By H. J. Michelman and P. Soldatos. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1–33 [in English]. [Duchacek I. D. Perforated Souvereignties: Towards a Typology of New Actors in International Relations / Federalism and International Relations / The Role of Subnational Units. Ed. By H. J. Michelman and P. Soldatos. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1990. P. 1–33].
Easton, D. (1953). The Political System, an Inquiry into the State of Political Science. NY: Alfred A. Knopf Inc [in English]. [Easton D. The Political System, an Inquiry into the State of Political Science. NY: Alfred A. Knopf Inc. 1953. 320 p.]
Elazar, D.J. (1966). American Federalism: A View from the States. NY: Crowell [in English]. [Elazar D. J. American Federalism: A View from the States. NY: Crowell, 1966. 228 p.]
Elazar, D.J. (1993). International and Comparative Federalism. PS: Political Science & Politics, 26(2). 190 – 195 [in English]. [Elazar D. J. International and Comparative Federalism. PS: Political Science & Politics. 1993. Vol. 26. Is. 2. P. 190–195].
Forest, B. (2018). Electoral Geography: From Mapping Votes to Representing Power. Geography Compass,12(1) [in English]. [Forest B. Electoral Geography: From Mapping Votes to Representing Power. Geography Compass. 2018. Vol. 12, Is. 1].
George, St. (2004). Multi-Level Governance and the European Union, 107 – 126 [in English]. [George St. Multi-Level Governance and the European Union. Multi-level Governance / I. Bache, M. Flinders (eds.). Oxford: OUP. 2004. P. 107–126].
Hechter, M., Mueller, S. & Siroky D. S. (2016). Center-Periphery Bargaining in the Age of Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review, 22(40), 439 – 453 [in English]. [Hechter M., Mueller S., Siroky D. S. Center-Periphery Bargaining in the Age of Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review. 2016. Vol. 22. Is .4. P. 439 – 453].
Heinelt, H. & Hlepas, Т. (2006). Typologies of Local Government Systems. The European Mayor Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy , 21 – 42 [in English]. [Heinelt H., Hlepas Т. – К. Typologies of Local Government Systems. The European Mayor Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy / H. Bäck, H. Heinelt, A. Magnier (eds.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. 2006. P. 21 – 42].
Hobson, J. (2011). What’s at Stake in ‘Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations’? Transcending ‘Chronofetishism’ and ‘Tempo Centrism’ in International Relations [in English]. [Hobson J. What’s at Stake in ‘Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations’? Transcending ‘Chronofetishism’ and ‘Tempo Centrism’ in International Relations. Historical Sociology of Internatioal Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 3–41].
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001. 251 p.]
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review,2, 233 – 243 [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review. 2003. No. 2. P. 233 – 243].
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2020). A Postfunctional Theory of European Integration [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. A Postfunctional Theory of European Integration. URL: http://www.unc.edu/depts/europe/conferences/euroskepticism/papers/hooghe_marks.doc (дата звернення 15.02.2023)].
Jeffery, Ch., & Wincott, D. (2010). The Challenge of Territorial Politics: Beyond Methodological Nationalism. New directions in political science: Responding to the challenges of an interdependend world, 167 – 188 [in English]. [Jeffery Ch., Wincott D. The Challenge of Territorial Politics: Beyond Methodological Nationalism. New directions in political science: Responding to the challenges of an interdependend world / C. Hay (ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2010. Р. 167 – 188].
Kaplan, M.A. (2005). System and Process in International Politics. UK: ECPR Press, University of Essex in Colchester [in English]. [Kaplan M. A. System and Process in International Politics. UK: ECPR Press, University of Essex in Colchester, 2005. 253 p.]
Keating, M. (2001). Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford [in English]. [Keating M. Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford: OUP, 2001. 212 p.]
Keating, M. (2008). Thirty Years of Territorial Politics. West European Politics, 31(1), 60 – 81 [in English]. [Keating M. (2008) Thirty Years of Territorial Politics. West European Politics. 2008. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 60 – 81].
Larkins, J. (2009). From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics before Westphalia. NY: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Larkins J. From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics before Westphalia. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 269 p.].
Lefebvre, H. (2009). State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press [in English]. [Lefebvre H. State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009. 330 p.].
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers [in English]. [Lefebvre H. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1991. 454 p.].
Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R.Y., & Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press [in English]. [Leonardi R., Nanetti R. Y., Putnam R. D. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993. 280 p.].
Levine, S. (2021, 22 Aug). ‘From dark art to dark science’: the evolution of digital gerrymandering. The Guardian [in English]. [Levine S. (2) ‘From dark art to dark science’: the evolution of digital gerrymandering. The Guardian. 22 Aug 2021. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/22/gerrymandering-uselectoral-districts-congress].
Linz, J., Stepan, A., & Yadav, Y. (2011). Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press [in English]. [Linz J., Stepan A., Yadav Y. Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2011. 336 p.]
Lipset, S.M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. NY: Free Press, 1 – 64 [in English]. [Lipset S. M., Rokkan S. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives / S. M. Lipset, and S. Rokkan (eds.). NY: Free Press, 1967. P. 1 – 64].
Lluch, J. (2011). Autonomism and Federalism. The Journal of Federalism [in English]. [Lluch J. Autonomism and Federalism. The Journal of Federalism. 27.05.2011. P. 1 – 28].
Loughlin, J. (2007). Subnational Government: The French Experience. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and NY: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Loughlin J. Subnational Government: The French Experience. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 239 p.]
Mueller, S. (2012). Federalism and the Concept of Political Territoriality Towards an Analytical Framework for Comparative Territorial Politics. Dans L'Europe en Formation, 1(363), 95 – 120 [in English]. [Mueller S. Federalism and the Concept of Political Territoriality Towards an Analytical Framework for Comparative Territorial Politics. Dans L'Europe en Formation. 2012. Vol. 1 No. 363. P. 95 – 120].
Muller, H., & Matthijs, В. (2001). Unravelling Territoriality in the European Union: Reconfiguring Territorial Affairs by Reconsidering the Guardian and Commercial Systems of Survival. Open Journal of Social Science, 9(5) [in English]. [Muller H., Matthijs В. Unravelling Territoriality in the European Union: Reconfiguring Territorial Affairs by Reconsidering the Guardian and Commercial Systems of Survival. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2001. Vol. 9. No. 5].
Nijman, J.E. (2016). The Renaissance of the City as a Global Actor – The Role of Foreign Policy and International Law Practices in the Construction of Cities as Global Actors’. The Transformation of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries from Antiquity to the Present. Oxford University Press, 209–241 [in English]. [Nijman J. The Renaissance of the City as a Global Actor – The Role of Foreign Policy and International Law Practices in the Construction of Cities as Global Actors’. The Transformation of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries from Antiquity to the Present /Eds. by Andreas Fahrmeier et al. Oxford University Press, 2016. Р. 209–241].
Page, E.C. (1992). Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-Government. Oxford: OUP [in English]. [Page E. C. Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-Government. Oxford: OUP, 1992. 200 p.].
Penrose, J. (2002). Nations, States and Homelands: Territory and Territoriality in Nationalist Thought. Nations and Nationalism, 8(3), 280 – 281 [in English]. [Penrose J. Nations, States and Homelands: Territory and Territoriality in Nationalist Thought. Nations and Nationalism. 2002. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 280 – 281].
Raffestin, C. (1984). Territoriality – A Reflection of the Discrepancies Between the Organization of Space and Individual Liberty. International Political Science Review, 5(2), 139 – 146 [in English]. [Raffestin C. Territoriality– A Reflection of the Discrepancies Between the Organization of Space and Individual Liberty. International Political Science Review. 1984. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 139 – 146].
Riker, W. (1964) Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company [in English]. [Riker W. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1964. 169 p.].
Rommele, A. (1999). Cleavage Structure and Party Systems in East and Central Europe. Cleavages, parties and voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania [in English]. [Rommele A. Cleavage Structure and Party Systems in East and Central Europe. Cleavages, parties and voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania / Lawson K., et. al. (eds.). Westport: Praeger, 1999. P. 3 – 17].
Rosenau, J.N. (1997). Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. NY: CUP [in English]. [Rosenau J. N. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. NY: CUP, 1997. 467 p.].
Schmitter, P.C. (1996). Examining the Present Euro-Polity with the Help of Past Theories. Governance in the European Union / G. Marks, F. Scharpf, P. Schmitter (eds.) London: Sage, 1–14 [in English]. [Schmitter P. C. Examining the Present Euro-Polity with the Help of Past Theories. Governance in the European Union / G. Marks, F. Scharpf, P. Schmitter, W. L. Streeck. (eds.) London: Sage Publications. 1996. P. 1 – 14].
Smith, B.C. (1985). Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: G. Allen & Unwin [in English]. [Smith B. C. Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1985. 227 р.].
Soja, E.W. (1971). The Political Organization of Space. Washington, D.C.: Resource paper No. 8., Association of American Geographers. Commission on College Geography [in English]. [Soja E. W. The Political Organization of Space. Washington, D.C.: Resource paper No. 8., Association of American Geographers. Commission on College Geography. 1971. 54 p.].
Vimmr, M. (2015). Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities at Local Level: Factors, Context and Empirical Examples. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences,15(4), 352 – 373 [in English]. [Vimmr M. Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities at Local Level: Factors, Context and Empirical Examples. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. 2015. Vol. 15. Is. 4. P. 352 – 373].
Walsh, D. (2018). Territorial Self-Government as a Conflict Management Tool. London: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Walsh D. Territorial Self-Government as a Conflict Management Tool. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 245 p.].
Watson, A. (1992). The Evolution of International Society. London and New York: Routledge [in English]. [Watson A. The Evolution of International Society. London and New York: Routledge, 1992. 346 p.].
Uzun, Y.V. (2021). Appropriation of space: organisation of interaction in complex political systems. Odesa: Phoenix [in Ukrainian]. [Узун Ю. В. Привласнення простору: організація взаємодії в складних політичних системах. Одеса: фенікс, 2021. 378 с.].
Published
2024-05-14
Section
THEORY AND HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT AND PROBLEMS OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE
