ТЕРИТОРІАЛЬНА ПОЛІТИКА В БАГАТОСКЛАДОВИХ СИСТЕМАХ ЯК ОБ’ЄКТ ТЕОРЕТИКО-МЕТОДОЛОГІЧНОГО АНАЛІЗУ
Ключові слова:
територіальна політика, методологія, політичні процеси, деконструкція світового порядку, конструктивізм, просторовий розвиток, децентралізація
Анотація
Стаття «Територіальна політика в багатоскладових системах як об’єкт теоретико-методологічного аналізу» присвячена аналізу еволюції методологічних підходів наукового дослідження територіальної політики. В статті вказуються етапи методологічного розвитку аналізу територіально-політичних систем (ТПС), що супроводжувалося трансформацією домінуючого об’єкту досліджень від: 1) «великих» ієрархічних «життєвих просторів» націй-держав; до 2) «мезорівня» ТПС і до 3) «мультимодальних просторових одиниць», що діють за Постмодерною логікою політичних акторів і досліджуються з 60-х рр. ХХ ст. на основі структуралізму, конструктивізму. Зазначено, що політичні процеси останніх семи десятиліть демонструють деконструкцію світового Порядку, що супроводжується реструктуризацією національно-політичних систем через посилення глокалізації. В статті досліджується злам «методологічного націоналізму» і заміна низхідної логіки аналізу висхідною, коли децентралізація національного в глобальному змістила увагу дослідників, стала інструментом просторово-територіальної деконструкції. В статті зазначено, що політичний процес, що конструюється в глобальному вимірі демонструє перетворення територіально-політичного простору з умови політичного процесу на результат політичного конструювання, де територіальна політика є комплексом заходів забезпечення територіального розвитку та стабілізації політичних систем. В першій частині статті «Територіальне володіння» VS. «Просторовий розвиток» автор розглядає методологічний поворот пов’язаний з інституціоналізацією європейської інтеграції в ЄС на тлі трансформації політичних зв’язків в постколоніальних системах. Зазначається, що ЄС став моделлю реалізації стратегії просторового розвитку складних політичних систем в умовах детериторіалізації політичного процесу, де концепт «територіальних володінь» було трансформовано на «просторовий розвиток», а регіон став модульною одиницею деієрархізації та децентралізації ТПС. В другій частині статті розглянуто теоретичні напрями, інтегровані в комплекс дослідження «територіальної політики»: федеральних досліжень (Federal Studies), місцевого самоврядування (Local Government Studies); багаторівневого управління (Multilevel Government Studies); поліцентричного врядування (Polycentric Governance); електоральної географії та урбаністики.
Посилання
Agranoff, R. (2004). Autonomy, Devolution and Intergovernmental Relations. Regional & Federal Studies, 14(1), 26 – 65 [in English]. [Agranoff R. Autonomy, Devolution and Intergovernmental Relations. Regional & Federal Studies. 2004. Vol. 14. Is. 1. P. 26 – 65].
Almond, G. (1956). Comparative Political Systems. The Journal of Politics, 18(3), 391–409 [in English]. [Almond G. Comparative Political Systems. The Journal of Politics. 1956. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 391 – 409].
Anthony, K. (2006). The Political Representation of Ethnic and Racial Minorities. Briefing Paper 3/06. NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service [in English]. [Anthony K. The Political Representation of Ethnic and Racial Minorities. Briefing Paper 3/06. NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service. 2006. 95 p.]
Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-Level Governance and the Study of the British State. Public Policy and Administration, 19(1), 31 – 51 [in English]. [Bache I., Flinders M. Multi-Level Governance and the Study of the British State. Public Policy and Administration. 2004. Vol. 19. Is. 1. P. 31 – 51].
Bennett, R.J. (1993). European Local Government Systems. Local Government in the New Europe. London – NY: Belhaven Press [in English]. [Bennett R. J. European Local Government Systems. Local Government in the New Europe. London – NY: Belhaven Press. 1993. P. 28 – 47].
Bloemraad, I. (2013). Accessing the Corridors of Power: Puzzles and Pathways to Understanding Minority Representation. West European Politics, 36(3), 652 – 670 [in English]. [Bloemraad I. Accessing the Corridors of Power: Puzzles and Pathways to Understanding Minority Representation. West European Politics. 2013. Vol. 36. No. 3. P. 652 – 670].
Bogdanor, V. (1979). Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: OUP [in English]. [Bogdanor V. Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: OUP, 1979. 342 p.]
Brenner, N. (1998). Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 5(1), 1 – 37 [in English]. [Brenner N. Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy. 1998. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 1 – 37].
Bulpitt, J. (1983). Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: an Interpretation. Manchester: Manchester University Press [in English]. [Bulpitt J. Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: an Interpretation. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1983. 250 p.]
Burgess, M. (2006). Territoriality and Federalism in the Governance of the European Union. State Territoriality and European Integration / M. Burgess and H. Vollaard (eds.). London: Routledge, 100 – 119 [in English]. [Burgess M. Territoriality and Federalism in the Governance of the European Union. State Territoriality and European Integration / M. Burgess and H. Vollaard (eds.). London: Routledge, 2006. P. 100 – 119].
Burrows, B., & Denton G. (1980). Devolution or Federalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan [in English]. [Burrows B., Denton G. Devolution or Federalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1980. 94 p.].
Carmichael, P., Massey, A., McMillan, J., & Rhodes, R.A.W. (2003). Decentralizing the Civil Service from Unitary State to Differentiated Polity in the United Kingdom. Buckinghem: Open University Press [in English]. [Carmichael P., Massey A., McMillan J., Rhodes R.A.W. Decentralizing the Civil Service from Unitary State to Differentiated Polity in the United Kingdom. Buckinghem: Open University Press, 2003. 208 р.].
Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy,13(1), 5 – 21 [in English]. [Carothers T. The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy. 2002. Vol. 13. No 1. P. 5 – 21].
Dardanelli, P. (2009). Europeanization as Heresthetics: Party Competition over Self-Government for Scotland, 1974–97. Party Politics, 15(1), 49 – 68 [in English]. [Dardanelli P. Europeanization as Heresthetics: Party Competition over Self-Government for Scotland, 1974–97. Party Politics. 2009. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 49 – 68].
De Witte, B., Ott, A., & Vos, E. (2017). Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory of Differentiation in EU Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing [in English]. [De Witte B., Ott A., Vos E. Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory of Differentiation in EU Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. 448 p.]
Deschouwer, K. (2003). Political Parties in Multi-Layered Systems. European Urban and Regional Studies,10, 213 – 226 [in English]. [Deschouwer K. Political Parties in Multi-Layered Systems. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2003. No. 10. P. 213 – 226].
Duchacek, I.D. (1987). Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. Lanham. MD: University Press of America [in English]. [Duchacek I. D. Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. Lanham. MD: University Press of America, 1987. 370 p.]
Duchacek, I.D. (1990). Perforated Souvereignties: Towards a Typology of New Actors in International Relations / Federalism and International Relations / The Role of Subnational Units. Ed. By H. J. Michelman and P. Soldatos. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1–33 [in English]. [Duchacek I. D. Perforated Souvereignties: Towards a Typology of New Actors in International Relations / Federalism and International Relations / The Role of Subnational Units. Ed. By H. J. Michelman and P. Soldatos. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1990. P. 1–33].
Easton, D. (1953). The Political System, an Inquiry into the State of Political Science. NY: Alfred A. Knopf Inc [in English]. [Easton D. The Political System, an Inquiry into the State of Political Science. NY: Alfred A. Knopf Inc. 1953. 320 p.]
Elazar, D.J. (1966). American Federalism: A View from the States. NY: Crowell [in English]. [Elazar D. J. American Federalism: A View from the States. NY: Crowell, 1966. 228 p.]
Elazar, D.J. (1993). International and Comparative Federalism. PS: Political Science & Politics, 26(2). 190 – 195 [in English]. [Elazar D. J. International and Comparative Federalism. PS: Political Science & Politics. 1993. Vol. 26. Is. 2. P. 190–195].
Forest, B. (2018). Electoral Geography: From Mapping Votes to Representing Power. Geography Compass,12(1) [in English]. [Forest B. Electoral Geography: From Mapping Votes to Representing Power. Geography Compass. 2018. Vol. 12, Is. 1].
George, St. (2004). Multi-Level Governance and the European Union, 107 – 126 [in English]. [George St. Multi-Level Governance and the European Union. Multi-level Governance / I. Bache, M. Flinders (eds.). Oxford: OUP. 2004. P. 107–126].
Hechter, M., Mueller, S. & Siroky D. S. (2016). Center-Periphery Bargaining in the Age of Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review, 22(40), 439 – 453 [in English]. [Hechter M., Mueller S., Siroky D. S. Center-Periphery Bargaining in the Age of Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review. 2016. Vol. 22. Is .4. P. 439 – 453].
Heinelt, H. & Hlepas, Т. (2006). Typologies of Local Government Systems. The European Mayor Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy , 21 – 42 [in English]. [Heinelt H., Hlepas Т. – К. Typologies of Local Government Systems. The European Mayor Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy / H. Bäck, H. Heinelt, A. Magnier (eds.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. 2006. P. 21 – 42].
Hobson, J. (2011). What’s at Stake in ‘Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations’? Transcending ‘Chronofetishism’ and ‘Tempo Centrism’ in International Relations [in English]. [Hobson J. What’s at Stake in ‘Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations’? Transcending ‘Chronofetishism’ and ‘Tempo Centrism’ in International Relations. Historical Sociology of Internatioal Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 3–41].
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001. 251 p.]
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review,2, 233 – 243 [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review. 2003. No. 2. P. 233 – 243].
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2020). A Postfunctional Theory of European Integration [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. A Postfunctional Theory of European Integration. URL: http://www.unc.edu/depts/europe/conferences/euroskepticism/papers/hooghe_marks.doc (дата звернення 15.02.2023)].
Jeffery, Ch., & Wincott, D. (2010). The Challenge of Territorial Politics: Beyond Methodological Nationalism. New directions in political science: Responding to the challenges of an interdependend world, 167 – 188 [in English]. [Jeffery Ch., Wincott D. The Challenge of Territorial Politics: Beyond Methodological Nationalism. New directions in political science: Responding to the challenges of an interdependend world / C. Hay (ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2010. Р. 167 – 188].
Kaplan, M.A. (2005). System and Process in International Politics. UK: ECPR Press, University of Essex in Colchester [in English]. [Kaplan M. A. System and Process in International Politics. UK: ECPR Press, University of Essex in Colchester, 2005. 253 p.]
Keating, M. (2001). Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford [in English]. [Keating M. Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford: OUP, 2001. 212 p.]
Keating, M. (2008). Thirty Years of Territorial Politics. West European Politics, 31(1), 60 – 81 [in English]. [Keating M. (2008) Thirty Years of Territorial Politics. West European Politics. 2008. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 60 – 81].
Larkins, J. (2009). From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics before Westphalia. NY: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Larkins J. From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics before Westphalia. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 269 p.].
Lefebvre, H. (2009). State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press [in English]. [Lefebvre H. State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009. 330 p.].
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers [in English]. [Lefebvre H. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1991. 454 p.].
Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R.Y., & Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press [in English]. [Leonardi R., Nanetti R. Y., Putnam R. D. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993. 280 p.].
Levine, S. (2021, 22 Aug). ‘From dark art to dark science’: the evolution of digital gerrymandering. The Guardian [in English]. [Levine S. (2) ‘From dark art to dark science’: the evolution of digital gerrymandering. The Guardian. 22 Aug 2021. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/22/gerrymandering-uselectoral-districts-congress].
Linz, J., Stepan, A., & Yadav, Y. (2011). Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press [in English]. [Linz J., Stepan A., Yadav Y. Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2011. 336 p.]
Lipset, S.M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. NY: Free Press, 1 – 64 [in English]. [Lipset S. M., Rokkan S. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives / S. M. Lipset, and S. Rokkan (eds.). NY: Free Press, 1967. P. 1 – 64].
Lluch, J. (2011). Autonomism and Federalism. The Journal of Federalism [in English]. [Lluch J. Autonomism and Federalism. The Journal of Federalism. 27.05.2011. P. 1 – 28].
Loughlin, J. (2007). Subnational Government: The French Experience. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and NY: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Loughlin J. Subnational Government: The French Experience. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 239 p.]
Mueller, S. (2012). Federalism and the Concept of Political Territoriality Towards an Analytical Framework for Comparative Territorial Politics. Dans L'Europe en Formation, 1(363), 95 – 120 [in English]. [Mueller S. Federalism and the Concept of Political Territoriality Towards an Analytical Framework for Comparative Territorial Politics. Dans L'Europe en Formation. 2012. Vol. 1 No. 363. P. 95 – 120].
Muller, H., & Matthijs, В. (2001). Unravelling Territoriality in the European Union: Reconfiguring Territorial Affairs by Reconsidering the Guardian and Commercial Systems of Survival. Open Journal of Social Science, 9(5) [in English]. [Muller H., Matthijs В. Unravelling Territoriality in the European Union: Reconfiguring Territorial Affairs by Reconsidering the Guardian and Commercial Systems of Survival. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2001. Vol. 9. No. 5].
Nijman, J.E. (2016). The Renaissance of the City as a Global Actor – The Role of Foreign Policy and International Law Practices in the Construction of Cities as Global Actors’. The Transformation of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries from Antiquity to the Present. Oxford University Press, 209–241 [in English]. [Nijman J. The Renaissance of the City as a Global Actor – The Role of Foreign Policy and International Law Practices in the Construction of Cities as Global Actors’. The Transformation of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries from Antiquity to the Present /Eds. by Andreas Fahrmeier et al. Oxford University Press, 2016. Р. 209–241].
Page, E.C. (1992). Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-Government. Oxford: OUP [in English]. [Page E. C. Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-Government. Oxford: OUP, 1992. 200 p.].
Penrose, J. (2002). Nations, States and Homelands: Territory and Territoriality in Nationalist Thought. Nations and Nationalism, 8(3), 280 – 281 [in English]. [Penrose J. Nations, States and Homelands: Territory and Territoriality in Nationalist Thought. Nations and Nationalism. 2002. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 280 – 281].
Raffestin, C. (1984). Territoriality – A Reflection of the Discrepancies Between the Organization of Space and Individual Liberty. International Political Science Review, 5(2), 139 – 146 [in English]. [Raffestin C. Territoriality– A Reflection of the Discrepancies Between the Organization of Space and Individual Liberty. International Political Science Review. 1984. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 139 – 146].
Riker, W. (1964) Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company [in English]. [Riker W. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1964. 169 p.].
Rommele, A. (1999). Cleavage Structure and Party Systems in East and Central Europe. Cleavages, parties and voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania [in English]. [Rommele A. Cleavage Structure and Party Systems in East and Central Europe. Cleavages, parties and voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania / Lawson K., et. al. (eds.). Westport: Praeger, 1999. P. 3 – 17].
Rosenau, J.N. (1997). Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. NY: CUP [in English]. [Rosenau J. N. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. NY: CUP, 1997. 467 p.].
Schmitter, P.C. (1996). Examining the Present Euro-Polity with the Help of Past Theories. Governance in the European Union / G. Marks, F. Scharpf, P. Schmitter (eds.) London: Sage, 1–14 [in English]. [Schmitter P. C. Examining the Present Euro-Polity with the Help of Past Theories. Governance in the European Union / G. Marks, F. Scharpf, P. Schmitter, W. L. Streeck. (eds.) London: Sage Publications. 1996. P. 1 – 14].
Smith, B.C. (1985). Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: G. Allen & Unwin [in English]. [Smith B. C. Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1985. 227 р.].
Soja, E.W. (1971). The Political Organization of Space. Washington, D.C.: Resource paper No. 8., Association of American Geographers. Commission on College Geography [in English]. [Soja E. W. The Political Organization of Space. Washington, D.C.: Resource paper No. 8., Association of American Geographers. Commission on College Geography. 1971. 54 p.].
Vimmr, M. (2015). Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities at Local Level: Factors, Context and Empirical Examples. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences,15(4), 352 – 373 [in English]. [Vimmr M. Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities at Local Level: Factors, Context and Empirical Examples. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. 2015. Vol. 15. Is. 4. P. 352 – 373].
Walsh, D. (2018). Territorial Self-Government as a Conflict Management Tool. London: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Walsh D. Territorial Self-Government as a Conflict Management Tool. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 245 p.].
Watson, A. (1992). The Evolution of International Society. London and New York: Routledge [in English]. [Watson A. The Evolution of International Society. London and New York: Routledge, 1992. 346 p.].
Uzun, Y.V. (2021). Appropriation of space: organisation of interaction in complex political systems. Odesa: Phoenix [in Ukrainian]. [Узун Ю. В. Привласнення простору: організація взаємодії в складних політичних системах. Одеса: фенікс, 2021. 378 с.].
Almond, G. (1956). Comparative Political Systems. The Journal of Politics, 18(3), 391–409 [in English]. [Almond G. Comparative Political Systems. The Journal of Politics. 1956. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 391 – 409].
Anthony, K. (2006). The Political Representation of Ethnic and Racial Minorities. Briefing Paper 3/06. NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service [in English]. [Anthony K. The Political Representation of Ethnic and Racial Minorities. Briefing Paper 3/06. NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service. 2006. 95 p.]
Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-Level Governance and the Study of the British State. Public Policy and Administration, 19(1), 31 – 51 [in English]. [Bache I., Flinders M. Multi-Level Governance and the Study of the British State. Public Policy and Administration. 2004. Vol. 19. Is. 1. P. 31 – 51].
Bennett, R.J. (1993). European Local Government Systems. Local Government in the New Europe. London – NY: Belhaven Press [in English]. [Bennett R. J. European Local Government Systems. Local Government in the New Europe. London – NY: Belhaven Press. 1993. P. 28 – 47].
Bloemraad, I. (2013). Accessing the Corridors of Power: Puzzles and Pathways to Understanding Minority Representation. West European Politics, 36(3), 652 – 670 [in English]. [Bloemraad I. Accessing the Corridors of Power: Puzzles and Pathways to Understanding Minority Representation. West European Politics. 2013. Vol. 36. No. 3. P. 652 – 670].
Bogdanor, V. (1979). Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: OUP [in English]. [Bogdanor V. Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: OUP, 1979. 342 p.]
Brenner, N. (1998). Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 5(1), 1 – 37 [in English]. [Brenner N. Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy. 1998. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 1 – 37].
Bulpitt, J. (1983). Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: an Interpretation. Manchester: Manchester University Press [in English]. [Bulpitt J. Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: an Interpretation. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1983. 250 p.]
Burgess, M. (2006). Territoriality and Federalism in the Governance of the European Union. State Territoriality and European Integration / M. Burgess and H. Vollaard (eds.). London: Routledge, 100 – 119 [in English]. [Burgess M. Territoriality and Federalism in the Governance of the European Union. State Territoriality and European Integration / M. Burgess and H. Vollaard (eds.). London: Routledge, 2006. P. 100 – 119].
Burrows, B., & Denton G. (1980). Devolution or Federalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan [in English]. [Burrows B., Denton G. Devolution or Federalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1980. 94 p.].
Carmichael, P., Massey, A., McMillan, J., & Rhodes, R.A.W. (2003). Decentralizing the Civil Service from Unitary State to Differentiated Polity in the United Kingdom. Buckinghem: Open University Press [in English]. [Carmichael P., Massey A., McMillan J., Rhodes R.A.W. Decentralizing the Civil Service from Unitary State to Differentiated Polity in the United Kingdom. Buckinghem: Open University Press, 2003. 208 р.].
Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy,13(1), 5 – 21 [in English]. [Carothers T. The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy. 2002. Vol. 13. No 1. P. 5 – 21].
Dardanelli, P. (2009). Europeanization as Heresthetics: Party Competition over Self-Government for Scotland, 1974–97. Party Politics, 15(1), 49 – 68 [in English]. [Dardanelli P. Europeanization as Heresthetics: Party Competition over Self-Government for Scotland, 1974–97. Party Politics. 2009. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 49 – 68].
De Witte, B., Ott, A., & Vos, E. (2017). Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory of Differentiation in EU Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing [in English]. [De Witte B., Ott A., Vos E. Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory of Differentiation in EU Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. 448 p.]
Deschouwer, K. (2003). Political Parties in Multi-Layered Systems. European Urban and Regional Studies,10, 213 – 226 [in English]. [Deschouwer K. Political Parties in Multi-Layered Systems. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2003. No. 10. P. 213 – 226].
Duchacek, I.D. (1987). Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. Lanham. MD: University Press of America [in English]. [Duchacek I. D. Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. Lanham. MD: University Press of America, 1987. 370 p.]
Duchacek, I.D. (1990). Perforated Souvereignties: Towards a Typology of New Actors in International Relations / Federalism and International Relations / The Role of Subnational Units. Ed. By H. J. Michelman and P. Soldatos. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1–33 [in English]. [Duchacek I. D. Perforated Souvereignties: Towards a Typology of New Actors in International Relations / Federalism and International Relations / The Role of Subnational Units. Ed. By H. J. Michelman and P. Soldatos. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1990. P. 1–33].
Easton, D. (1953). The Political System, an Inquiry into the State of Political Science. NY: Alfred A. Knopf Inc [in English]. [Easton D. The Political System, an Inquiry into the State of Political Science. NY: Alfred A. Knopf Inc. 1953. 320 p.]
Elazar, D.J. (1966). American Federalism: A View from the States. NY: Crowell [in English]. [Elazar D. J. American Federalism: A View from the States. NY: Crowell, 1966. 228 p.]
Elazar, D.J. (1993). International and Comparative Federalism. PS: Political Science & Politics, 26(2). 190 – 195 [in English]. [Elazar D. J. International and Comparative Federalism. PS: Political Science & Politics. 1993. Vol. 26. Is. 2. P. 190–195].
Forest, B. (2018). Electoral Geography: From Mapping Votes to Representing Power. Geography Compass,12(1) [in English]. [Forest B. Electoral Geography: From Mapping Votes to Representing Power. Geography Compass. 2018. Vol. 12, Is. 1].
George, St. (2004). Multi-Level Governance and the European Union, 107 – 126 [in English]. [George St. Multi-Level Governance and the European Union. Multi-level Governance / I. Bache, M. Flinders (eds.). Oxford: OUP. 2004. P. 107–126].
Hechter, M., Mueller, S. & Siroky D. S. (2016). Center-Periphery Bargaining in the Age of Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review, 22(40), 439 – 453 [in English]. [Hechter M., Mueller S., Siroky D. S. Center-Periphery Bargaining in the Age of Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review. 2016. Vol. 22. Is .4. P. 439 – 453].
Heinelt, H. & Hlepas, Т. (2006). Typologies of Local Government Systems. The European Mayor Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy , 21 – 42 [in English]. [Heinelt H., Hlepas Т. – К. Typologies of Local Government Systems. The European Mayor Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy / H. Bäck, H. Heinelt, A. Magnier (eds.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. 2006. P. 21 – 42].
Hobson, J. (2011). What’s at Stake in ‘Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations’? Transcending ‘Chronofetishism’ and ‘Tempo Centrism’ in International Relations [in English]. [Hobson J. What’s at Stake in ‘Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations’? Transcending ‘Chronofetishism’ and ‘Tempo Centrism’ in International Relations. Historical Sociology of Internatioal Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 3–41].
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001. 251 p.]
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review,2, 233 – 243 [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review. 2003. No. 2. P. 233 – 243].
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2020). A Postfunctional Theory of European Integration [in English]. [Hooghe L., Marks G. A Postfunctional Theory of European Integration. URL: http://www.unc.edu/depts/europe/conferences/euroskepticism/papers/hooghe_marks.doc (дата звернення 15.02.2023)].
Jeffery, Ch., & Wincott, D. (2010). The Challenge of Territorial Politics: Beyond Methodological Nationalism. New directions in political science: Responding to the challenges of an interdependend world, 167 – 188 [in English]. [Jeffery Ch., Wincott D. The Challenge of Territorial Politics: Beyond Methodological Nationalism. New directions in political science: Responding to the challenges of an interdependend world / C. Hay (ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2010. Р. 167 – 188].
Kaplan, M.A. (2005). System and Process in International Politics. UK: ECPR Press, University of Essex in Colchester [in English]. [Kaplan M. A. System and Process in International Politics. UK: ECPR Press, University of Essex in Colchester, 2005. 253 p.]
Keating, M. (2001). Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford [in English]. [Keating M. Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford: OUP, 2001. 212 p.]
Keating, M. (2008). Thirty Years of Territorial Politics. West European Politics, 31(1), 60 – 81 [in English]. [Keating M. (2008) Thirty Years of Territorial Politics. West European Politics. 2008. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 60 – 81].
Larkins, J. (2009). From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics before Westphalia. NY: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Larkins J. From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics before Westphalia. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 269 p.].
Lefebvre, H. (2009). State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press [in English]. [Lefebvre H. State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009. 330 p.].
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers [in English]. [Lefebvre H. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1991. 454 p.].
Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R.Y., & Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press [in English]. [Leonardi R., Nanetti R. Y., Putnam R. D. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993. 280 p.].
Levine, S. (2021, 22 Aug). ‘From dark art to dark science’: the evolution of digital gerrymandering. The Guardian [in English]. [Levine S. (2) ‘From dark art to dark science’: the evolution of digital gerrymandering. The Guardian. 22 Aug 2021. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/22/gerrymandering-uselectoral-districts-congress].
Linz, J., Stepan, A., & Yadav, Y. (2011). Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press [in English]. [Linz J., Stepan A., Yadav Y. Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2011. 336 p.]
Lipset, S.M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. NY: Free Press, 1 – 64 [in English]. [Lipset S. M., Rokkan S. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives / S. M. Lipset, and S. Rokkan (eds.). NY: Free Press, 1967. P. 1 – 64].
Lluch, J. (2011). Autonomism and Federalism. The Journal of Federalism [in English]. [Lluch J. Autonomism and Federalism. The Journal of Federalism. 27.05.2011. P. 1 – 28].
Loughlin, J. (2007). Subnational Government: The French Experience. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and NY: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Loughlin J. Subnational Government: The French Experience. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 239 p.]
Mueller, S. (2012). Federalism and the Concept of Political Territoriality Towards an Analytical Framework for Comparative Territorial Politics. Dans L'Europe en Formation, 1(363), 95 – 120 [in English]. [Mueller S. Federalism and the Concept of Political Territoriality Towards an Analytical Framework for Comparative Territorial Politics. Dans L'Europe en Formation. 2012. Vol. 1 No. 363. P. 95 – 120].
Muller, H., & Matthijs, В. (2001). Unravelling Territoriality in the European Union: Reconfiguring Territorial Affairs by Reconsidering the Guardian and Commercial Systems of Survival. Open Journal of Social Science, 9(5) [in English]. [Muller H., Matthijs В. Unravelling Territoriality in the European Union: Reconfiguring Territorial Affairs by Reconsidering the Guardian and Commercial Systems of Survival. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2001. Vol. 9. No. 5].
Nijman, J.E. (2016). The Renaissance of the City as a Global Actor – The Role of Foreign Policy and International Law Practices in the Construction of Cities as Global Actors’. The Transformation of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries from Antiquity to the Present. Oxford University Press, 209–241 [in English]. [Nijman J. The Renaissance of the City as a Global Actor – The Role of Foreign Policy and International Law Practices in the Construction of Cities as Global Actors’. The Transformation of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries from Antiquity to the Present /Eds. by Andreas Fahrmeier et al. Oxford University Press, 2016. Р. 209–241].
Page, E.C. (1992). Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-Government. Oxford: OUP [in English]. [Page E. C. Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-Government. Oxford: OUP, 1992. 200 p.].
Penrose, J. (2002). Nations, States and Homelands: Territory and Territoriality in Nationalist Thought. Nations and Nationalism, 8(3), 280 – 281 [in English]. [Penrose J. Nations, States and Homelands: Territory and Territoriality in Nationalist Thought. Nations and Nationalism. 2002. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 280 – 281].
Raffestin, C. (1984). Territoriality – A Reflection of the Discrepancies Between the Organization of Space and Individual Liberty. International Political Science Review, 5(2), 139 – 146 [in English]. [Raffestin C. Territoriality– A Reflection of the Discrepancies Between the Organization of Space and Individual Liberty. International Political Science Review. 1984. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 139 – 146].
Riker, W. (1964) Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company [in English]. [Riker W. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1964. 169 p.].
Rommele, A. (1999). Cleavage Structure and Party Systems in East and Central Europe. Cleavages, parties and voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania [in English]. [Rommele A. Cleavage Structure and Party Systems in East and Central Europe. Cleavages, parties and voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania / Lawson K., et. al. (eds.). Westport: Praeger, 1999. P. 3 – 17].
Rosenau, J.N. (1997). Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. NY: CUP [in English]. [Rosenau J. N. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. NY: CUP, 1997. 467 p.].
Schmitter, P.C. (1996). Examining the Present Euro-Polity with the Help of Past Theories. Governance in the European Union / G. Marks, F. Scharpf, P. Schmitter (eds.) London: Sage, 1–14 [in English]. [Schmitter P. C. Examining the Present Euro-Polity with the Help of Past Theories. Governance in the European Union / G. Marks, F. Scharpf, P. Schmitter, W. L. Streeck. (eds.) London: Sage Publications. 1996. P. 1 – 14].
Smith, B.C. (1985). Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: G. Allen & Unwin [in English]. [Smith B. C. Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1985. 227 р.].
Soja, E.W. (1971). The Political Organization of Space. Washington, D.C.: Resource paper No. 8., Association of American Geographers. Commission on College Geography [in English]. [Soja E. W. The Political Organization of Space. Washington, D.C.: Resource paper No. 8., Association of American Geographers. Commission on College Geography. 1971. 54 p.].
Vimmr, M. (2015). Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities at Local Level: Factors, Context and Empirical Examples. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences,15(4), 352 – 373 [in English]. [Vimmr M. Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities at Local Level: Factors, Context and Empirical Examples. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. 2015. Vol. 15. Is. 4. P. 352 – 373].
Walsh, D. (2018). Territorial Self-Government as a Conflict Management Tool. London: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]. [Walsh D. Territorial Self-Government as a Conflict Management Tool. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 245 p.].
Watson, A. (1992). The Evolution of International Society. London and New York: Routledge [in English]. [Watson A. The Evolution of International Society. London and New York: Routledge, 1992. 346 p.].
Uzun, Y.V. (2021). Appropriation of space: organisation of interaction in complex political systems. Odesa: Phoenix [in Ukrainian]. [Узун Ю. В. Привласнення простору: організація взаємодії в складних політичних системах. Одеса: фенікс, 2021. 378 с.].
Опубліковано
2024-05-14
Розділ
ТЕОРІЯ ТА ІСТОРІЯ ПОЛІТИЧНОЇ ДУМКИ. АКТУАЛЬНІ ПРОБЛЕМИ ПОЛІТИЧНОГО ДИСКУРСУ
